Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Full Opera by night.jpg

File:Full Opera by night.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2010 at 16:41:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Krakers - uploaded by Krakers - nominated by Patriot8790 -- патриот8790 (talk) 16:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- патриот8790 (talk) 16:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice shot, unfortunately quite noisy in some areas. Why not chose an earlier time of the day to have more light thus being able to use a smaller iso? Did you do some selective noise-reduction? Some areas have heavy noise while others are more or less noise-free. Maybe some experts here can help you to get a better noise reduction, it would be worth a try. --AngMoKio (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice, but noisy at full res. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture ! Iadrian yu (talk) 19:22, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - all the lights (most obvious with the small background lights top left) are double, presumably due to camera shake. Agree with AngMoKio, a daytime shot would be better. PS looks a shocking place for safety, do people wheel their prams up to the top of the roof, then let them roll back down into the water? 8-) - MPF (talk) 20:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice, but noisy in dark areas. Looks it was taken at 800 iso, and subsequently level adjusted. I wouldn't say it would be better at daytime, but here a tripod would have helped for sure - Benh (talk) 23:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Technically not perfect, yet one of the best pictures of this building presently on Commons. Very interesting lighting. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ggia (talk) 09:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Poor image quality. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Sharpness, noise. --Steindy (talk) 09:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great picture but noise ruins it. --Aktron (talk) 12:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture, I'd say the lighting is good and I don't have a problem with any noise.Mtaylor848 (talk) 11:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose quality issues (noise, blurryness) --ianaré (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]