Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Parade Front Doors, West Hoe, Plymouth.jpg

File:Grand Parade Front Doors, West Hoe, Plymouth.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2023 at 01:01:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
Info created and uploaded by Y.ssk - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-captured and colorful shot made with a iPhone XS Max (daylight considerably helps Apple devices to create sharp ones). -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Seems to be off-centre. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perspective correction? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Off-centre and needs PC as the comments above say, but also I don't find the motif too interesting and the level of detail is low for the small-ish resolution. BigDom (talk) 16:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An amazing catch and certainly a photo that made me take a second look. The compositional issue is unfortunate. If you have an opportunity to take another exposure of these doors, please do so and I'll support a new nomination. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Agreed. I'd also suggest trying to shoot across the street with the iPhone's portrait lens for less distortion. Street view looks like that should be possible.--El Grafo (talk) 09:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Off-centre and needs perspective correction per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 23:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done @The person who loves reading: please read the guidelines and explain your vote. "A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment To give this photo a little bit love: I understand the charm of this subject, the symmetrical portals with the abruptly changing paint are really nice. But the technical quality is not really on FP level, sorry. --Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Technical shortcomings aren't serious and to me the catchiness of the image makes up for it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]