Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hall of Knights (Brežice Castle).jpg

File:Hall of Knights (Brežice Castle).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2016 at 07:14:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info Hall of Knights (Brežice Castle) in HDR. All by me. --Mile (talk) 07:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 07:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There's a lot that's pretty about this photo, but are the brightest highlights clipped/posterized? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Some might be its in HDR. Otherwise its part of Trompe-l'œil tehnique (some frescos make optical illusion). --Mile (talk) 07:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not referring to the frescoes but where there's a lot of light on the chairs and other surfaces. I've decided to Oppose a feature on that basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:13, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support. This has for sure a great wow, but the HDR effect is too strong in my opinion, so I am not convinced by the details. In fact, I doubt that HDR is really necessary here, as there are no extremely bright or dark areas. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support as Uoaei1 --Verde78 (talk) 09:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support--M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 10:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. The bright light from the window should benefit from HDR but the result here is clipped and lacking in detail on those chairs. I wonder if an alternative HDR processing workflow would help. Several here use PtGui (to create HDR TIFF) and Lightroom (to tonemap back to JPG). -- Colin (talk) 11:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Here is option without HDR, side walls come off. --Mile (talk) 11:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 04:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too soft/posterized and the HDR technique isn't optimal. Lack of detail. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 02:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposed zones, overprocesed. --The Photographer (talk) 12:35, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as others. --Hubertl 20:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Overprocessed, per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Will try once more later. --Mile (talk) 13:57, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]