Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Impatiens glandulifera.JPG
File:Impatiens glandulifera.JPG edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2019 at 05:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order_:_Ericales
Info: Himalayan balsam (Impatiens glandulifera) blooming at the rare Charitable Research Reserve, Ontario, Canada-- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Comment Like the previous one, I think this is too dark. For me, this is a better light for these flowers. --Cart (talk) 09:08, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Cart. I see in the EXIF that the flash fired, which explains the quite harsh light. Still good, but the bar for flower FPs is quite high. Cmao20 (talk) 10:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Oppose that's clearly underexposed --El Grafo (talk) 13:39, 11 October 2019 (UTC) (Might be fixable in post. If so, please ping me when a new version is uploaded)
Done: redeveloped from RAW and brightened Cart, Cmao20, El Grafo. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:47, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
._01.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment much better now, but still not quite FP level (per Cmao20). --El Grafo (talk) 13:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support No longer underexposed. --Axel (talk) 15:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Regardless of the light, those two buds or whatever at left are too much of a distraction. Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: the seed pods were included intentionally to avoid the same boring dead-centered composition. They are a part of the plant, so to call them a great distraction is a bit baffling. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Support for this view: less boring, non-centered, and also good to have another sharp detail of the plant. --Axel (talk) 06:36, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:51, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
