Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Interior of Santa Maria Maggiore (Rome) - Cappella Paolina.jpg

File:Interior of Santa Maria Maggiore (Rome) - Cappella Paolina.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 10:37:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 18:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support maybe a bit overprocessed, but still... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Roma infinita --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but again, this looks nothing like any other shot of the cuppola. The interior part of the cuppola appears to be too cold and dark and as in other images, blue and yellow tones are very dominant, which is very much unlike any of the comparison images. Imho it is a strange pattern that keeps repeating itself in some of your images and that several people have noted before, without receiving any good explanation or having the chance to see a flat or raw image before your post-processing that could confirm that your edit is more realistic than the other images. --DXR (talk) 07:49, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

good or valid explanation? because is this? What i can answer if you tell (for example) that the sky is green? Cupola is this,this are the colours...don't like? Ok. But don't ask me because a Cupola have this colors. Danke p.s. and let's finish with these low-quality photos of google, those are not realistic --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I understand your argument in principle and after our previous discussions, I guess we are not getting anywhere here... --DXR (talk) 13:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mild Oppose – impressive level of detail but contrast overdone IMHO, apart from the colour temperature question. The glare on the golden decorations is just too bright for me. Is a remake possible? --Kreuz schnabel 11:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Broken colors. Looks like those colorized WB pictures. And I don't buy that this is more realistic than the images shown by the Google query. File:Santa_Maria_Maggiore,_cappella_Paolina_cupola.JPG has issues, but I bet the colors are closer to reality. Compression settings can certainly be better (20Mo is too big). - Benh (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 05:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support weak support. --Hubertl 20:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above -- Jiel (talk) 11:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]