Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jasmine White
File:Jasmine White.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2010 at 22:57:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Hoverflyz - uploaded by Hoverflyz - nominated by Hoverflyz -- HoverFly (Contribs...Chat?) 22:57, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- HoverFly (Contribs...Chat?) 22:57, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- The white flowers are severely overexposed (no details are shown due to excessive light) and unsharp. Close to FPX. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: the flowers are like that - all white --HoverFly (Contribs...Chat?) 23:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, clearly this was taken under a shadow, you can see a spot of sunlight in the distance in the upper right. --IdLoveOne (talk) 00:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Info -- Well, if this is not overexposed, I give up ... Alvesgaspar (talk) 05:35, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Fine, but I must admit, it is just mildly overexposed, it's only at the first third of the chart!Stubbornly, HoverFly (Contribs...Chat?) 13:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)- If I'm not mistaken, the left part of the chart shows underexposed pixels (quite a few), and the right part shows the overexposed - there's very few of those, but all of them are on the subject of the photo. Wolf (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm used to looking at charts of that sort from the opposite direction... Never mind what I said before - you win-HoverFly (Contribs...Chat?) 16:42, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- If I'm not mistaken, the left part of the chart shows underexposed pixels (quite a few), and the right part shows the overexposed - there's very few of those, but all of them are on the subject of the photo. Wolf (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Info -- Well, if this is not overexposed, I give up ... Alvesgaspar (talk) 05:35, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Alvesgaspar--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 19:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 18 September 2010 (UTC)