Open main menu
Babel
gl
es
pt-3
en-1
Cscr-featured.svgThis user has uploaded 16 featured pictures to Wikimedia Commons.
Quality images logo.svgThis user has uploaded 2590 quality images to Wikimedia Commons.
98,100+This user has made over 98,100 contributions to Wikimedia projects.
54.868+This user has made over 54.868 contributions to Commons.
Noia 64 apps karm.svgThis user has been on Commons for
14 years and 9 days
Felicidade A very happy boy.jpg
Conversas arquivadas en User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores.
Conversations archived at User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores.

Contents

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Areeiro. Madeira. Portugal '06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 13:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Areeiro. Madeira. Portugal '04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:05, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Areeiro. Madeira. Portugal '05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 13:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Camiño de Pico do Areeiro. Madeira. Portugal '02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --Peulle 11:55, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico das Torres. Madeira. Portugal '13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico das Torres. Madeira. Portugal '15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Cedro. Madeira. Portugal '11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Cidrão. Madeira. Portugal '08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Gato. Madeira. Portugal '12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Check this imageEdit

Could you look at this image for me, and tell me what is wrong with it. File:Liberty Service Station, Birmingham Gardens.jpg --Adamdaley 03:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamdaley (talk • contribs) 03:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Hellow @Adamdaley: (poor English): It has the same issues. In this case, the lack of clarity is greater and difficult to correct. The vertical line of the left is right, but the vertical line of the right is tilted: It needs perspective correction.
I don't know why the lack of sharpness. You have e good camera. The pictures are less moved if you take it by the viewfinder and you support the camera firmly on the head.
To fix the perspective distortion it's necessary Lightroom, or GIMP (free), or photoshop (too expensive)... --Lmbuga (talk) 10:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
@@Lmbuga: I understand. With the above file, I was able to do it more front on than the 7-Eleven prices you edited. My knowledge of Photoshop is basic and I cannot do the corrective correction. --Adamdaley 00:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamdaley (talk • contribs) 00:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
  • @Adamdaley:I do not have photoshop now. After Easter, yes (computer of a friend). I think it's a filter. Menu "filters". I am sorry. There are help on the internet.--Lmbuga (talk) 08:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
@Adamdaley: https://www.creativebloq.com/adobe/3-ways-fix-perspective-errors-photoshop-71412122--Lmbuga (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Cedro. Madeira. Portugal '13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Cidrão. Madeira. Portugal '10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico Ruivo. Madeira. Portugal '16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nubes desde o Pico do Areeiro Madeira Portugal-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Nubes desde o Pico do Areeiro Madeira Portugal-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Escudo de Santana Madeira Portugal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Olivier LPB 14:18, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Faial Santana Madeira Portugal-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Somewhat more description would be useful. --Smial 16:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  Done Thanks--Lmbuga 00:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Faial Santana Madeira Portugal-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 15:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Serro do Guindastre Faial Santana Madeira Portugal-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto ate a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de São Lourenço. Madeira. Portugal-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 14:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto ate a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de São Lourenço. Madeira. Portugal-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 14:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Vista de Madeira desde a Ponta de São Lourenço. Portugal-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Corte do terreo en Pico do Areeiro Madeira. Portugal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:36, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto até a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de San Lourenzo. Madeira. Portugal-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 11:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Pomone. Francois Barois París P08'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --PJDespa 12:06, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Busto de bronce de Andre le Notre deseñador e arquitecto paisaxista de xardines Tuilieries, París P06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Annibal by François Girardon París P10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Annibal by François Girardon París P11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Xulio (Jules) César por Nicolás Coustou París P07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --PJDespa 12:06, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
The face of the statue is too dark and the leg is too bright. Good quality? -- Spurzem 19:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Good quality IMO, the statue is like that because of the weather, the leg is still white but the head is darker, it is due to actual patina of the time. A post treatment would be unuseful IMO --PJDespa 12:49, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Paisaxe dede o Pico do Areeiro Madeira. Portugal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto até a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de San Lourenzo. Madeira. Portugal-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto até a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de San Lourenzo. Madeira. Portugal-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto até a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de San Lourenzo. Madeira. Portugal-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 13:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Vista da costa desde a Ponta do Rosto até a Ponta do Castelo. Ponta de São Lourenço. Madeira. Portugal-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Reasonably successful effort in not the best lighting --Daniel Case 04:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Vista de Madeira desde a Ponta de San Lourenzo. Portugal-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Reasonably sharp all around, save lower corners --Daniel Case 04:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 L'Hiver (Winter) by Girardon Château de Versailles P26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Cour de Marbre du Château de Versailles P22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A beautiful composition a Q1+, but not a FP. Left part is a bit shadowed and the colour of the sky is a bit too white --Michielverbeek 20:59, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Cour de Marbre du Château de Versailles P23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:01, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2017 L'Air by le Hongre Grande Commande 1684 Versailles P26.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:2017 L'Air by le Hongre Grande Commande 1684 Versailles P26.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2017 L'Air by le Hongre Grande Commande 1684 Versailles P26.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

  • @Magog the Ogre:. Thank you and sorry. {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} added. I don't have deleted the tag "no license". Yours sincerely also--Lmbuga (talk) 11:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Tag deleted--Lmbuga (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Hercule det aussi Vertumne. Rome. d'après Nicolas Poussin Versailles P28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Embarcación turística Alexandre III París P03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --XRay 12:28, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Embarcación turística París P17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 L'Air by le Hongre Grande Commande 1684 Versailles P26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Pomone. Nicolas Poussin Versailles P29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I'd prefare to have more of it's socket on there, but its ok. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 03:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Elefante. Éléphant. Emmanuel Fremiet. Exposition Universelle 1878. París P31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 L'Amerique du Sud. Aimé Millet. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 L'Amerique du Sud. Aimé Millet. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 L'Océanie. Mathurin Moreau-Vauthier. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 L'Amérique du Nord. Ernest Hiolle. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Escultura no Palacio de Versalles París P21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 L'Amérique du Nord. Ernest Hiolle. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 L'Afrique. Eugène Delaplanche. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 L'Asie. Alexandre Falguière. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 L'Europe. Alexandre Schoenewerk. Exposition Universelle 1878. Paris P39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Cheval à la herse by Pierre Louis Rouillard. Paris P40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Jakubhal 12:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Cour de Marbre du Château de Versailles P24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Esculturas na fachada de Notre-Dame P43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Gets abit blurry on the right side but still ok. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
  Comment Thanks. You're right ToMar. I'm not sure: Maybe it should not be QI. It's on the limit. I had not noticed. I would not have proposed it if I had noticed. Thank you very much--Lmbuga 23:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Esculturas na fachada de Notre-Dame P44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Rosetón de Notre-Dame P45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Tour Saint-Jacques P42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, BUT this is not Notre-Dame de Paris! It is Tour Saint Jacques. --Uoaei1 13:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
  Done: Photo tagged to rename. Thank you very much--Lmbuga 07:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Notre-Dame de Paris P51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Notre-Dame de Paris P53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Notre-Dame de Paris P54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Portail de la Vierge. Notre-Dame de París P59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Tympanum of the Portail de la Vierge. Notre-Dame de Paris P58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 19:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Tympanum of the Portail de la Vierge. Notre-Dame de Paris P57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Portail de la Vierge. Notre-Dame de Paris P56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Shame about the right shade. But good picture quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Portail de la Vierge. Notre-Dame de Paris P55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Notre-Dame de Paris P52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Notre-Dame de Paris P49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 14:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Portail du Jugement Dernier of Notre-Dame de Paris P62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 12:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Spire of Notre-Dame de Paris P46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Parteluz. Portail du Jugement Dernier of Notre-Dame de Paris P63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Portail du Jugement Dernier of Notre-Dame de Paris P64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 03:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sotavento 01 - IESMGB 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 22:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Motor JT9D Boeing 747 -4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 MUNCIP. Motor JT9D Boeing 747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:17, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sotavento 04 - Maquinaria aeroxenerador 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Faro. MUNCIP. A Coruña. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --PJDespa 12:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Sotavento. Planta de xeración de hidróxeno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Sotavento. Planta de transformación de hidróxeno en enerxía eléctrica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Female Misumena vatia near Botevgrad, Bulgaria 02.jpgEdit

@Exonie: and @Charlesjsharp: (poor English, sorry)

First of all, to say that it is impossible for me to make a macro as good as this one. However, I know what it is to be sitting on the floor for half an hour and seeing the behavior of a spider.

Second, understand that I am simply an amateur photographer. My opinions are not law.

The photo is great, but I wonder what it would be like if the photographer tried something different. Something like what I did in these pictures, although they are worse photos, because they do not have that depth of field: (Think that F8 is the maximum that that camera allows, Canon PowerShot G10) File:Ficheiro-Araña alimentándose de Auchenorrhyncha. Bastavales, Brión, 090905.jpg. Other: File:Araña. A Estrada, Galiza. 02.jpg. Other: File:Araña. Ordes- 09-04-12 D.jpg.

Maybe I should not make that comment. I am sorry. Anyway, thank you for asking for clarifications--Lmbuga (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your reply. Yes, probably is best not to make a suggestion on technical choices unless you're pretty sure! Your FPs are nice shots. Taking images with a macro lens is a real challenge because of the small depth of field and, being so close, lighting is a nightmare. That's why my default is ISO 800 and around 1/500 sec to avoid camera shake - as you know, we cannot hold the camera securely when chasing insects and spiders. Charles (talk) 16:17, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
  • @Charlesjsharp: You're right with ISO 800 and around 1/500 sec, but controlling the flash (previous photos were taken with external flash), you can try to go further in the depth of field. Thank you for your words of encouragement --Lmbuga (talk) 16:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
On sunny days i can 'afford' ISO 400 but experimentally in the general case i get better shots with ISO 800. I trade some noise for better contours, it's not the best macro lens i have :-) I don't like flash but i use it sometimes in order to decrease aperture and get better depth of field, i should buy some LED ring i guess. I'm amateur photographer so any tips are welcomed. I'll be uploading more insects and spiders soon. --Exonie (talk) 17:49, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Sotavento. Steam turbine rotor. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

The car is a bit disturbing. Good quality. Basotxerri Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:59:52 GMT
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Sotavento. Steam turbine rotor 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality. Basotxerri Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:59:52 GMT
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 MUNCYT Boeing 747 -7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Escultura. Palacio de Versalles P41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Escultura. La Victoire sur l'Empire. Palacio de Versailles V03. Francia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 12:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Versalles. Francia V07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Fonte. Versalles. Francia V05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Sculpture. Parc de Versailles, parterre de Latone. Francia V04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016. Pico do Areeiro. Madeira. Portugal '07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 00:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Embarcación "Imperiale". París.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Armenak Margarian 20:14, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Bacchus d'après Poussin V13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico do Xuízo Final. Notre-Dame 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico do Xuízo Final. Notre-Dame 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico do Xuízo Derradeiro. Notre-Dame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico do Xuízo Final. Notre-Dame 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico do Xuízo Final. Notre-Dame 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Notre-Dame de Paris from the south'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I find the tree disturbing. But the photo has a good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Portail Sainte Anne of Notre-Dame de Paris'1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Portail Sainte Anne of Notre-Dame de Paris'2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Portail du Jugement Dernier of Notre-Dame de Paris'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Detalle do Pórtico de Santa Ana. Notre-Dame 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

File:FdMontes.jpgEdit

 
File:FdMontes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Estevoaei (talk) 01:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Pierre Granier - Ino et Mélicerte-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pudelek 11:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Pierre Granier - Ino et Mélicerte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pudelek 11:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Simon Mazière - Pan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 20:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Olivier LPB 08:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Bacchante dite aussi Pomone- Pierre Laviron V14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Torre de Notre-Dame de París-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 11:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Torre de Notre-Dame de París-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 -Detalle de Notre-Dame de París. 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017. Facultade de dereito. Universidade de París.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:30, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 -Le palais du Luxembourg, dans le jardin du Luxembourg, Paris-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:59, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 -Le palais du Luxembourg, dans le jardin du Luxembourg, Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:54, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Atamari 11:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 11:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Combarro, Poio. Galiza-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. G. Torrente Ballester. A Armenteira-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. G. Torrente Ballester. A Armenteira-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Mosteiro da Armenteira. 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 17:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Alexandre Bóveda. Pontevedra. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. G. Torrente Ballester. A Armenteira-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Looks good. --Rbrechko 13:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Vista da costa norte desde o lateral sur da praia de Pantín. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ximonic 13:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Praia de Pantín. Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pudelek 12:46, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Praia de Pantín. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ximonic 13:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

QIEdit

Hi, you added some image notations on my images that is helpful. And it will be more helpful if I could better learn to understand QI, also how to resolve problems. ~Moheen (keep talking) 20:04, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Español: Gracias por su comentario, pero no entiendo lo que usted desea
Maybe it's better for you, @Moheen Reeyad:, to talk to a user who can easily express in English, and not with the google translator--Lmbuga (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Praia de Pantín. Galiza-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Praia de Santa Comba e Praia dos Ponzos desde Cabo Prior. Ferrol. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Castelo da Palma. Mugardos. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Castelo da Palma. Mugardos. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Detalle do Castelo de San Felipe. Ferrol. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Ruínas de Santo Domingo. XIV-XV. Pontevedra. 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Pozo no Castelo de San Felipe. Ferrol. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Detalle do Castelo de San Felipe. Ferrol. Galicia-Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 04:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Entrada do Castelo de San Felipe. Ferrol. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Pozo no Castelo de San Felipe. Ferrol. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --TwoWings 06:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Loro parque. Tenerife-279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:17, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018. Loro parque. Tenerife-234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 15:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Chelonoidis nigra. Loro parque. Tenerife-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Alligator mississippiensis. Loro parque. Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Chelonoidis nigra. Loro parque. Tenerife-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)Edit

    * Happy Holidays 2019, Lmbuga! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 16:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Lmbuga".