Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:KB.Kościół św. Andrzeja w Trzebieszowicach.jpg

File:KB.Kościół św. Andrzeja w Trzebieszowicach.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2018 at 06:48:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created and uploaded by Poconaco - nominated by Albertus teolog -- Albertus teolog (talk) 06:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 06:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 08:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Can you do something about the horizontal lines on the tree in the lower right corner? Also, just above the upper right side of the house to the left of the church, the sky has a crackly texture - is that natural or a product of something to do with the picture-taking or processing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PumpkinSky talk 13:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice - I really like the light on the church roof. :) --Peulle (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Scene nice enough to overlook some technical issues. There is posterisation in the sky just above the dark building on the left. Quite a lot of lens flare. I'm not sure what caused the horizontal lines on the tree (more visible if you brighten the image) -- perhaps pattern noise from the camera sensor? -- Colin (talk) 17:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Magical atmosphere. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 20:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I'm going to interrupt the approval by acclaim. I don't think those horizontal lines are acceptable in an FP of a static scene. At the very least, I would want to see that problem rectified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a long exposure shot and probably the shadows were lifted. I'd stay it's more likely to occur on static (edit: dark) scene actually. - Benh (talk) 08:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. But I don't think that makes it more acceptable. I think the viewer understands motion blur, but not this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressed by the sharpness of the building, and this cemetery under snow has something special -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be great though to get rid of those 2 lens flares (notes added) Poc o² 18:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered support, and Happy New Year! Despite its technical imperfections (none of which would be problematic to correct), it still has a very Christmas-card feel despite the absences of any obvious (to me, anyway), Christmas motifs. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus 18:48, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the picture very much. But there are many strange patterns and textures (as Ikan and Colin have mentioned + „waves“ around the reflector lamp and diagonal lines below the right streetlamp) and four lens flares (I've found two more). — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 18:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 12:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--PumpkinSky talk 12:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings