Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kenyon Cox nude study2.jpg
File:Kenyon Cox nude study2.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2009 at 22:26:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Kenyon Cox - uploaded by Durova - nominated by Durova. Restored from File:Kenyon Cox nude study.jpg by Durova. -- Durova (talk) 22:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Durova (talk) 22:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)- Support Very good restoration. Yann (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 01:30, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Marvelous! Rastrojo (D•ES) 14:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Petritap (talk) 16:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Highly unnatural colouring for a graphite image. I have prepared an alternative version, which, for convenience, I'll nominate separately, since it's late in this nomination. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:32, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Comment If there is a better version maybe this should be withdrawn, otherwise we will need to replace it. /Daniel78 (talk) 21:55, 25 October 2009 (UTC)- Oppose Per Adam Cuerden, support Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Kenyon_Cox_nude_study3.jpg. -- JovanCormac 11:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose As it is not withdrawn I am also opposing to avoid getting both versions featured. /Daniel78 (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- That can't happen according to our rules, but I want to see the right one get Featured. -- JovanCormac 09:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- Right, but disregarding the rules it can happen, the bot closes it and someone approves. Just trying to avoid unnecessary manual cleanup work. /Daniel78 (talk) 12:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- This version is continuing to receive consensus support at a sister project due to loss of texture in the alternate edit. So letting the candidacy continue. Durova (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- So this will become another case where two different versions of a picture are Featured on separate projects? Let's hope not... -- JovanCormac 12:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- This version is continuing to receive consensus support at a sister project due to loss of texture in the alternate edit. So letting the candidacy continue. Durova (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- Right, but disregarding the rules it can happen, the bot closes it and someone approves. Just trying to avoid unnecessary manual cleanup work. /Daniel78 (talk) 12:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- That can't happen according to our rules, but I want to see the right one get Featured. -- JovanCormac 09:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Berthold Werner (talk) 15:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
