Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Krakow - Kosciol Mariacki.jpg

File:Krakow - Kosciol Mariacki.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2021 at 19:36:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I won't oppose, but there are posterization lines in the sky that would be best smoothed out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support the contrast makes it look nice :) SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan and one big dust spot between towers. --Mile (talk) 08:01, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the spot. No idea how to fix posterization though. If i simply use "spot fix" all over the sky, will it do any good? --Andrei (talk) 10:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I make one more edit (posterization). But mistake was made at the beggining. Low JPEG quality - 13 Mpx file at 1,51 MB. I hope its fine now or revert, up to Jar.ciurus. --Mile (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a mil, Mile! Jar.ciurus is not active for years, so i am alone here --Andrei (talk) 18:44, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That solved the problem. Still undecided on whether to support but definitely no reason for me to consider opposing now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very good composition and sharpness. --Milseburg (talk) 13:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive. As often in Jar Ciurus’ photos there has been IMHO too much/strong denoising applied, but the result is still good and the composition and mood are very good. --Aristeas (talk) 14:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The sky seems to be deep blue except near the pillars and the church where it is lighter. See my notes. Introduced during post-processing? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:50, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Until sky explained or sorted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:43, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The view of the church is interesting and the image is very sharp, but the right tower in the upper part is slightly bent on the outer side probably as a result of perspective correction.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Unfortunately, I am bothered that both columns are blurred by about 90 percent. This creates a weird contrast. But the composition, mood and light are really great! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not sure about the added value of the second arch but still, quality and mood are there, and the spot is very crowded --Poco a poco (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 08:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland