Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lille Lungegårdsvannet, Bergen, Noruega, 2019-09-08, DD 58-64 PAN.jpg

File:Lille Lungegårdsvannet, Bergen, Noruega, 2019-09-08, DD 58-64 PAN.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2020 at 17:20:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Norway
Info Panoramic view of Lille Lungegårdsvannet, a small 5 acres (0.020 km²) lake in the centre of the city of Bergen, Norway. The octagonal lake is a natural lake that was historically connected to the nearby Store Lungegårdsvannet bay via a short strait, but the strait was filled in 1926. Today the lake is located in a park in the city centre. There is a large decorative fountain located in the central part of the lake. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ultrawide panoramas rarely make me go "wow", but this one just did. Very nice! P.S. If I were you I would clone out the distracting leaves at the far left. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
KoH: leaves removed Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice panorama but I think I can see a stitching error (see note). Cmao20 (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cmao20: if you refer to the steps of the beton border of the lake it isn't a stitching issue, I checked the original frames. --Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Fair enough. Cmao20 (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think I'd prefer a composition that cropped everything to the left and right of the hill, but at full size, it's totally fine to see everything. I guess this is a cylindrical projection, and if so, that should be stated. I marked a dark spot for you to look at it and see what it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek: I usually leave it open to Adobe Lightroom to decide the type of projection. It did go for a spherical projection, as I was curious about the result with cylindrical projection (I'd have also affirmed that it was indeed a cylindrical projection) I tried it and I do actually prefer the result with cylindrical projection although the difference is minor.

I added the type of the projection in the description first but opted for adding that information to the panorama template (that parameter was not supported, so I introduced it). I think that spot is better to describe the type of projection as for most people that information is not essential. --Poco a poco (talk) 09:00, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fine with me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm sorry, but I'm not wowed by this (midday lighting). --Ivar (talk) 10:51, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MartinD (talk) 12:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 12:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 21:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Norway