Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Loveparade-Unglück-2010-CN, Ostrampe.jpg
File:Loveparade-Unglück-2010-CN, Ostrampe.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2010 at 18:40:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created Carschten, uploaded and retouched by Carschten/Niabot, nominated by Carschten. The image shows the situation at the stairs ten days after the Loveparade 2010. Including in the composition are the candles and wreaths in the foreground, flags at the fence of countries where some of the dead persons come from and a/the central point of the whole catastrophe: the stairs at the ramp in the background. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support And with good image notes. --Timk70 (talk) 00:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, but the picture dosn't work for me. The composition looks a bit random. Why cuting the wreaths left and right? You wrote that they are countless; why don't take a picture of the whole scene with a wider view?! And I don't think "Die Todes-Treppe" is a good image note! This would be a nice name for a Hitchcock movie but not as a image note in a picture with that background story. --mathias K 12:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with mathias. The composition does seem kind of random. More of the memorial would help. -- Sdgjake (talk) 16:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Its OK as a quality foto but it might be pushing it to make this be a featured foto. The composition is random (and understandable) as one would expect here but I cannot say if this is a superb foto since the composition is also distracting. Korman (talk) 07:01, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose --Brackenheim (talk) 02:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose --Peter Weis (talk) 19:06, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per above--MZaplotnik (my contribs) 09:54, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 28 August 2010 (UTC)