Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Main Dome of Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.jpg

File:Main Dome of Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2011 at 22:35:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye -- JovianEye (talk) 22:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JovianEye (talk) 22:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 22:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Might I draw attention to the bad crop. Especially at the bottom right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.71.233 (talk • contribs)
- Question Who's speaking? No anonymous comments, please. -- MJJR (talk) 22:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The histogram indicates a clear lack of contrast.--Snaevar (talk) 13:50, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lack of contrast? -- IdLoveOne (talk)
- Yes, contrast. Histograms are not only useful of analyzing over and underexposure, but some knowledge of reading them is required to find out if images have lack of contrast. I suggest you google how to read histograms, since you find that surprising.--Snaevar (talk) 02:07, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok, I've tried and adjusted the histogram. See if it is better now. --JovianEye (talk) 02:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I know, just seems like a weird reason to oppose. Almost an indirect request for digital tweaking and adjustments that might majorly change the mood and apparent timing of the image is all, not that that's necessarily a bad thing. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Also, I appreciate your rude implication about as much as I appreciate Benh's. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 09:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could imo be a bit darker. --Mbdortmund (talk) 11:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The window on the left could still be a bit darker, but its already much better now. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:00, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Mbdortmund --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per Snaevar--shizhao (talk) 13:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Snaevar's issue with the histogram have been addressed (I believe so). Can you still not see the difference? --JovianEye (talk) 14:42, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:07, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]