Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Map of the Portion of Abyssinia Tranversed by the British Expedition in 1868.jpg
File:Map of the Portion of Abyssinia Tranversed by the British Expedition in 1868.jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2017 at 15:17:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Maps
- Info Rare and unique on Commons created by Unknown, all else by Janweh64 (talk) 15:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Janweh64 (talk) 15:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing exceptional in this map, neither the size or the quality. Yann (talk) 17:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - I may disagree somewhat with Yann: I consider this map featurable, but only if the resolution (size) is increased substantially and it's digitally restored. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, you don't really disagree with me. ;oD I also think that it may be featured if it would be much bigger, and of better quality, i.e. restored. As we say in French: Avec des si, on mettrait Paris en bouteille. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Nice saying. I think the English-language equivalent is w:If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, you don't really disagree with me. ;oD I also think that it may be featured if it would be much bigger, and of better quality, i.e. restored. As we say in French: Avec des si, on mettrait Paris en bouteille. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan Kekek. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan and Yann. Daniel Case (talk) 23:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Janweh64 : Its isnt bad, but should pass restoring, and shot in higher resolution. --Mile (talk) 10:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the size and quality are too low | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
lNeverCry 01:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 17:26, 15 January 2017 (UTC)