Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pico de Teide.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2011 at 13:47:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • no much wow or surprising about your vote, but you are definitly wrong with the estimation this picture is a centered composition. where is harsh lighting? there is nothing overexposed, expert Benh. --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:42, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Who said it was overexposed ? If you have time, u could use it to fix ur previous nom instead of judging people over here (obviously, wasn't as easy as you first thought...). - Benh (talk) 17:59, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose The composition doesn't bother me as the pillar on the left makes a nice contrast with the centered mountain, but I have to agree about the lighting. It's uninteresting lighting, and a bit hazy. Can it be re-photographed at sunrise/sunset? The sameness of the colors makes the image seem flat. Maybe a polarizer could cut through the haze. Just my suggestion. – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 18:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose -- Flat lighting, uninteresting composition. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • commend Benh says the lightning is harsh, Alvesgaspar thinks it is too flat. What is the truth of this contradict opinions? Maybe non of them. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No contradiction that I see. The light coming from above is strong and flat, a little like a flash aimed directly at the subject. This results in harsh shadows but little structure and detail. Alvesgaspar (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]