Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Potsdamer Platz vom Reichstag aus 2005.jpg

File:Potsdamer Platz vom Reichstag aus 2005.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2010 at 21:59:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated by H005 -- H005 21:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H005 21:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support--M Zaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 06:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Trees blurred and too dark, and roof ornament almost invisible against them - MPF (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose May have been better with balloon being more predominant in the picture. Here it's not standing out enough to me. Quality issues raised by MPF as well (although I understand dawn lighting was against you). - Benh (talk) 15:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose like Behn. 3 different objects make this photo useless Przykuta → [edit] 16:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's good, but I don't like how there's not a single subject that's the focus of the image. In this case, there's only part of a building, part of a skyline, and a very small balloon. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 20:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kevin Payravi. It's interesting, but the composition does not work. Jonathunder (talk) 23:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting how different this is seen. For me, that's what it makes so interesting, five main objects (Reichstag, Tiergarten, Potsdamer Platz, the sky and the balloon), all very distinct and all very different, so that it almost looks surrealistic. (Don't get me wrong, I fully respect your notion, although from my personal POV I find it hard imagine that one could see the composition as a disadvantage ...) -- H005

20:41, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Substandard technical quality for featured pictures --High Contrast (talk) 13:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]