Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) female Labuk Bay.jpg

File:Proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) female Labuk Bay.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2015 at 08:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info Proboscis monkey, female, Labuk Bay, Sabah, Borneo created by Charlesjsharp - uploaded by User:Charlesjsharp - nominated by User:Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 08:34, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 08:34, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support the nose of a pig. Tomer T (talk) 09:58, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting animal. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very interesting animal. I like the way the nose and the eyelash are standing out. It gives the photo a special flavour. --Hafspajen (talk) 11:52, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose fine, but unfortunate light imo, the whole face lies in shadow. Direction of light also causes the eyelash to be disturbing in contrast with the dark face. Jpeg artifacts too, do you shoot RAW? Useful, but not QI imo, sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 11:54, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I do shoot RAW but this version taken from JPEG. Eyelash is feature! Charles (talk) 13:42, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has some shade on the face too, and it is a fantastic picture, I say, could be featured too.... File:Noctem - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 06.jpg--Hafspajen (talk) 14:10, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:17, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm fine with the shadows. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:16, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Kadellar.--Fotoriety (talk) 00:41, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Even in shadow, the face is clear enough for me. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:37, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A few small,but nice and good --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:44, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 13:03, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent pose overcomes the quality. --Laitche (talk) 15:45, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support J e e 02:49, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:40, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:03, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:39, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not completely perfect (slight blown highlights on shoulder) but I'm not going to complain when so many other problematic aspects of photos like these (DoF, bokeh) are so adroitly handled. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Light is really not ideal. Neither is the detail. — Julian H.^✈ 16:02, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 16:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals