Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RR79.40.7A No. 1670 Leaf Spring.jpg

File:RR79.40.7A No. 1670 Leaf Spring.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2016 at 01:37:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:RR79.40.7A No. 1670 Leaf Spring.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RR79.40.7A No. 1670 Leaf Spring.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by me. -- Ram-Man 01:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Closeup of the leaf spring on this locomotive. It shows the glossy black paint used when restoring these old locomotives. -- Ram-Man 01:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral - It's an interesting photograph for sure, but I'm not feeling this as a FP. I do like the texture of the paint and the step-forms, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support interesting --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Very interesting and creative. The picture makes me curious to understand what I am seeing. Logically, I cannot understand why the composition works for me, but it does! -- Slaunger (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow for me. Additionally there are technical problems: red CA in the top right corner, green CA in the bottom left corner, and the bottom left corner is out of focus. -- Rftblr (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
  • You are right. The CA is to a large extend correctable, and I would propose to get that fixed. I can live with the focus issue. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like the leaf springs, but they don't stand out enough against the dark background. Not enough of a wow factor for me overall. INeverCry 18:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - That's basically the reason for my neutral vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Neutral pending a possible resolution of the CA and focus issues. Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the feedback. I'll look for a different copy of the image with more depth of field and try to fix the CA issues and then I'll renominate some other time. -- Ram-Man 23:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)