Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shrine at the señor de villaseca de cata church.jpg

File:Shrine at the señor de villaseca de cata church.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2012 at 00:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llorenzi (talk) 07:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support There should be a way to make the noise more aesthetic (since we won't get rid of it), but I like the mood. - Benh (talk) 10:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I hear you... ISO was high because it is a dark place so noise was inevitable. I was able to remove a lot of it with Lightroom. If it were a b&w image, film grain simulation would have worked! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 12:24, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Interesting; good feel. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 13:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another case where noise takes a back seat. Kleuske (talk) 16:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose creative and very interesting atmospheric work, but technically not good enough. Very noisy (may be okay, but the details are very low, visible e.g. at the photos and the letter below the shrine image) and bad exposure (too harsh contrast between the darkness at top (I see it was dark but it's too extreme here) and the overexposed candles). --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 08:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per kaʁstn. Tomer T (talk) 16:07, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]