Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silene vulgaris in Aspen (91171).jpg

File:Silene vulgaris in Aspen (91171).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2017 at 22:42:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info Silene vulgaris in the John Denver Sanctuary in Aspen, Colorado. all by me — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but perhaps the exposure could be raised a little bit? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: New version uploaded. Brightened the whole image slightly, and the plant itself slightly more. Also some minor denoising. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support PumpkinSky talk 01:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --cart-Talk 09:49, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Backgoround is disturbive. Needs more light, and better (more close-anoted) crop. --Mile (talk) 13:49, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I agree with Mile here. The other flowers at the bottom of the frame bother me as a viewer, maybe because they are also cropped off in a random-looking way. And unfortunately, there's no way to crop them out completely (I don't think Mile's proposed crop would work for me). But I'd like to see how this looks with the rest of those flowers included - do you have any way to add more content at the bottom of the picture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's not much more room available at the bottom (the second flower that's just slightly cut off in this version sits on the bottom edge in the original). I played with some cloning/stretching, but didn't come up with anything worth talking about. I think I'll leave it as is for the time being to get other opinions. I'd rather modify what's there than go with a tighter crop, though. Maybe darkening the background flowers and making them a bit greener to blend into the background more or something... — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Mile and Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 03:07, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]