Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stream Enäjärvi.jpg

File:Stream Enäjärvi.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2009 at 12:11:23

Info created by kallerna - uploaded by kallerna - nominated by kallerna —kallerna™ 12:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna™ 12:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment An interesting image, of a beautiful and magical time of year. It does seem a bit blurry, although I'm on a shocking CRT monitor at work, so I'll give it the benefit of the doubt. Also, what is wrong with the water? It looks like some of User:Tomascastelazo's crocodiles have taken up residence. 203.35.135.133 12:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info The water is almost frozen and there is sleet on it. —kallerna™ 13:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Support Calandrella (talk) 13:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. JalalV (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is good to have some monochrome pictures, which can be a neglected medium in these days of easy colour. Just one negative - composition - the stream disappears into almost dead centre, but you would probably have got your feet wet to get any different view. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 16:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 16:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miha (talk) 22:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wisnia6522 (talk) 09:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mountaineer (talk) 18:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry that I have to think outside the box :-)) I can imagine how wonderful it was to be at this place -but- what is remaining here on the picture is only a small proportion. No ice cristals, no details, no sparkle - it's not crisp rather blurry and a bit gloomy regarding the cue state. Snow is just a big white undefined surface. Looks fairly good in thumbnail but is weak in fullsize. --Richard Bartz (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meganmccarty (talk) 01:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Richard Bartz --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 13:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose - there's pretty severe JPEG artefacting all over this image. Which is really a pity, because the composition is superb. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As other opponents. --Karel (talk) 23:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support JohnIngraham (talk) 02:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting picture, but too bad quality. Artefacts, blurry and noisy. --SvonHalenbach (talk) 12:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Avjoska (talk) 10:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks fairly good in thumbnail but is weak in fullsize. That's right. --Kosiarz-PL 15:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per SvonHalenbach, too low quality for common subject. Taollan82 (talk) 20:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 12 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 21:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]