Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SvetiSedmochislenitsi-3.jpg

File:SvetiSedmochislenitsi-3.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2010 at 12:54:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by MrPanyGoff - uploaded by MrPanyGoff - nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff (talk) 12:54, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Request Can you reshoot this without pigeons? --IdLoveOne (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ;) Yes, I can reshoot it but this would be another matter. OK, if more commoners here think that the pigeons are distracting then I'm going to reshoot it.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 23:19, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I kind of like the pigeons, but is this slightly tilted? Jonathunder (talk) 22:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - not worried about the pigeons, and it is level (several of the brick courses aren't, but that's the building, not the photo!) - MPF (talk) 00:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I guess the pigeons aren't that much of a problem, you'd expect them to be hanging around. Nice mosaic. --IdLoveOne (talk) 21:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the pigeons add to the composition, actually. Steven Walling 01:53, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:03, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, should be rotated anti-clockwise (about −0.3°). —DerHexer (Talk) 12:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There is an optic illusion. I analysed it again with axis. The main problem is in the lower stone frame of the mosaic. The stone block that is in the lower left end is longer than the vertical outline of the frame. The block in the lower right end is somehow widen. Its horizontal outline is not parallel to the internal one that's why it looks hanging down. The all internal lines of the frame are strongly vertical or horizontal. The bars of the windows are strongly vertical too.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 12:13, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]