Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Terminal 4 del aeropuerto de Madrid-Barajas, España, 2013-01-09, DD 13.jpg

File:Terminal 4 del aeropuerto de Madrid-Barajas, España, 2013-01-09, DD 13.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2013 at 21:37:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info View of the roof of the terminal 4 of the airport Madrid-Barajas, Spain. All by me, Poc o² 21:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 21:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mono 21:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, completely excluding the ground would be fine in my opinion, but just cutting it off like that makes me want to see it. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 06:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, and what crop do you propose so taht you don't want to see the ground (full of people)? Poc o² 07:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't know what would be wrong with showing people. Airports are filled with people. This ist just a far better picture to me (not in quality of course, but in what it shows). --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 08:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose With Julian: Crop does not work for me. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose crop. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Ok, new try without a sharp crop, what do you think? would it have a chance? Poc o² 19:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose This crop is MUCH better than the previous one but the overall quality is not convincing. For sure: The shot was hand-held but with such a motive I would expect more details in the background areas. Question Is it possible that you have nominated a very similiar shot about half a year ago? Or was it on QI? From a compositional viewpoint there is a lot of accentuated (but nearly empty) foreground due to wide-angle and deep shooting position. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated a couple of them in QI, check the category, but none here. This is the first nomination. Poc o² 08:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah OK. I somehow recognized the motive :) As far as I can remember I have reviewed one of the airport photos on QI. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but not featurable enough for me. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I take it back, I am not convinced, either Poc o² 21:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]