Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:WLA cma The Sea at Le Havre 1868.jpg

File:WLA cma The Sea at Le Havre 1868.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2009 at 21:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by "dewey decimals", nominated by Yann (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely picture of a beautiful painting from the Wikipedia Loves Art project. Even the frame is nice... ;o) Yann (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The frame is not 2-dimensional, so unless the photograper releases the work under PD im not so sure about the pd status. --Korall (talk) 15:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- So what? It is not PD, it is CC-BY-SA. Yann (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If you add the frame into the picture, it shouldn't be cropped. Lycaon (talk) 07:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I don't understand. The frame is not cropped, is it? Yann (talk) 10:28, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - To me it looks as if it is. Maybe I'm wrong? Let's wait for more opinions... Lycaon (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - The frame is definitely cropped. Look in the top left corner at full size, you will see it instantly. -- JovanCormac 16:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Personally I find the frame distracting. Pick up any art history textbook; how often will you see images of paintings with their frames? Very rarely indeed. Or, more to the point, how often do you see them in wikipedia articles? See this example. Also the image page should credit Claude Monet, as his signature is clearly visible in the bottom left. -- Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy) (talk) 11:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Claude Monet added. Yann (talk) 11:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured.

Alternative, without frame, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2009 at 11:13:00 (UTC)

Support Without the frame. Yann (talk) 11:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The shadow from the frame is still visible at the top of the painting. --Korall (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I cropped it further. Yann (talk) 16:21, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - OK I wont really oppose but I dont want to support a cropped painting either. --Korall (talk) 20:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can still see signs of it on the top, left, and right. Didn't see this alternative before voting on the above. Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy) (talk) 11:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Yann (talk) 10:26, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]