Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weekend music on Paulista Avenue, São Paulo, Brazil.jpg

File:Weekend music on Paulista Avenue, São Paulo, Brazil.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2016 at 00:42:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info All by -- The Photographer (talk) 00:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition here doesn't quite work for me; we have the keyboardist cut off at left and a guy watching at far right recording the musicians on his phone who doesn't add to the composition the way a full inclusion of the keyboardist (a closer focus on the musicians) would have. The street sloping down to the left isn't optimal either. I would have moved the focus to the left to include the musicians fully and have the group of watchers balance the composition at right instead of the guy with the phone. INeverCry 01:56, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - As a musician, I definitely like the idea of this photo, but I'd like to see a more outstanding photo of one or more buskers. This is a very good photo. I'm not sure I'm feeling it as FP, but I respect it. I might reconsider later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose INC said it. w.carter-Talk 11:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Inappropriate use of level sharpening in photoshop. Have a look at the DoF - it is changing within one distance. For example the woman with the dotted skirt is (partly) sharp while the man left of her (with white T-Shirt) is totally blurred. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...plus obvious retouching marks on the tarmac ... Is it a composite photo? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's a composite picture, because the weather was too darked and it was imposible get more DoF (on focus peoples and the musician with the Saxophone) --The Photographer (talk) 04:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I see what you were thinking it could be, but it didn't come out that way. There's too much going on for the intended subject to be clear. It would be a good tourist shot, and maybe a QI, but it's not featurable. Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comments --The Photographer (talk) 04:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 04:57, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]