Info Self-nom. On the off-chance of boring the living crap out of you I post yet another coin. Despite the calls for super-rare and precious coins, I post a euro cent. Seems sensible to me to cover the more common cases first. Anyways, this one is dusted, tilt-free, and has a genuine shadow. Oh yeah, why do I bother posting it? Reasonable resolution and detail, plus apparently there is a shortage of FPC nominations (and promotions :-) ) currently. --Dschwen15:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I totally support this image, its quality, its humility, its value. Compared to the other euro-cent pictures which we have, shiny and new, this one is a real euro-cent. PS: I will also support a real one euro coin ;-) --Diligent16:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as i said before, i don't find simple coins interesting enough to be promoted as FP (no matter how hi-res it is). High resolution makes a boring picture not better and now i am beginning to dislike selfnomination. --SvonHalenbach20:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Out of curiosity, I surfed around coins and currencies of the world in English Wiki and I must say it could use some nicer images. Perhaps Dschwen could be persuaded to continue with more coins from around the world? I'd be happy to donate some coins from countries I frequent. Jnpet06:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support An excellent picture that would be hard to better from a technical point of view. Remember that FPs don't have to be beautiful. We could do with more like this. --MichaelMaggs16:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a useful image but why haven't you used a "clean" coin? however it's a little boring, but for a coin I think it's normal. --MattiaLuigiNappi 20:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Oppose - Zdecydowany sprzeciw!!! Kto wybrał tak brudną i zniszczoną monetę na takie zdjęcie??? Powinno się wybraś stan menniczy. MARCIN N19:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, lots of exclamation marks and question marks. If anybody can translate, I'd appreciate it. My polski is a little rusti :-). --Dschwen11:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He said: Strongly oppose!!! Who have choosen so dirty and worn-out coin for such picture??? On should choose a coin of mintical condition. (not sure about the last words - I don't know how do you call a coin in English that is in so good condtion that looks like it has just left the mint) --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 01:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info Self-nom. On the off-chance of boring the living crap out of you I post yet another coin. Despite the calls for super-rare and precious coins, I post a euro cent. Seems sensible to me to cover the more common cases first. Anyways, this one is dusted, tilt-free, and has a genuine shadow. Oh yeah, why do I bother posting it? Reasonable resolution and detail, plus apparently there is a shortage of FPC nominations (and promotions :-) ) currently. --Dschwen 15:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Support --Dschwen 15:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Oppose as i said before, i don't find simple coins interesting enough to be promoted as FP (no matter how hi-res it is). High resolution makes a boring picture not better and now i am beginning to dislike selfnomination. --SvonHalenbach 20:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment with all due respect, most of FP are about selecting the typical example, the typical gull, the typical wolf, the typical coffee beans, the typical tomatoe, the typical fire, etc. And a coin, used daily by 300 millions people is not less valuable than, say, a phyllodoce lineata to be featured. --Diligent 16:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
