Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DTM Mercedes w204 Schneider amk.jpg

Image:DTM Mercedes w204 Schneider amk.jpg - featured

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by AngMoKio -- AngMoKio 16:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Info Panning shot of a Mercedes-Benz DTM car. --AngMoKio 16:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- AngMoKio 16:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing panning work. Beautifully sharp for such speeds, high wow. --Freedom to share 17:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice Mfield 17:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support 1/100 of a second? masterly! Lycaon 18:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Thanks :) ...you need 1/100 to get a nice rotating wheel effect, which makes those shots tough especially at 210mm focal length. --AngMoKio 20:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, very nice work. Was this with an IS lens? --Dori - Talk 18:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
  • It was the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS which is a great lense. You can switch the IS into a mode in which it only corrects vertical shakes. Still it is tough and you produce quite some binary trash too :) --AngMoKio 20:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Nice.（＾＾）／ -- Laitche 19:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support VROAAAAM ! --Richard Bartz 21:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Looks simple but it's actually quite hard to get something this good.--MichaelMaggs 08:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose At the first moment, when I look only at the thumbnail I want to support the candidate. But after a clooser look at the original image I see that there's only the obvious photoshop enhancement to allure the pseudo-effect of dynamic blurredness or german-called "Bewegungsunschärfe" in the backround (especially the track structure). --Herrick 09:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Well...here I have to object heavily! This is not a fake blur made with photoshop. Send me your email address and I send you the original file from the cam. --AngMoKio 10:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
    • If the community would take a look at the difference between real motion blur for instance at your own image Image:DTM_car_mercedes2006_Haekkinen_racing.jpg and the artificial round structures on the track there's no need for exchanging *Rar-Files. It's not your fault, but I'am generally sick of seing pimped images on this featured list and in other competitions (Example: Take a look at the swan). Meine Emailadresse ist auf meiner Benutzerseite hinterlegt und wir können das Gespräch gerne in unserer Muttersprache fortführen. Es ist ein gutes Foto, dass IMHO diese Pseudodynamik gar nicht nötig hätte - aber hier sieht man wieder einmal den latenten Minderwertigkeitskomplex der digitalen Fotografie. --Herrick 16:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
      • The differences between this and my other pic you mentioned are various: different focal length (17mm and 210mm), a different light situation resulting in quite different apertures (f/5.6 and f/14) and last but not least is the background further away from the car resulting in a heavy motion blur. --AngMoKio 17:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
      • IMO this assertion of a "fake" motionblur is very weak. Assuming a cognition of a artificial MB with a resulting oppose vote is critical. I would agree if we have a picture like this --Richard Bartz 22:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support If the motion blur were fake – which it clearly isn't – it deserved an extra award. --Dontpanic 10:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Congratulatiuons to the author of image! --Karelj 18:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support RTG 22:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Dany3000 16:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agree with Freedom to share, I am impressed by the sharpness of the image. Cirt 09:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --D kuba 12:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Great! --Chmehl 20:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice taken (Must have been hard) and I can't complain about anything beeing blurry or low res. --Kanonkas_(talk) 12:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

16 support, 1 oppose >> featured -- Alvesgaspar 21:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)