Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DirkvdM natural spiral.jpg

Image:DirkvdM natural spiral.jpg - not featured edit

Info created by DirkvdM - uploaded by DirkvdM - self-nominated by DirkvdM
Support --DirkvdM 08:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose DOF, focus, species name, even resolution.... -- Lycaon 09:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say a wider DOF would have killed the photo aesthetically, but that's a matter of taste. DirkvdM 14:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Neat! Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 18:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the depth of field works great. Ideally it'd be nice to know what plant this was, though. Higher-res would be more ideal, too. --Fastfission 04:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gordo 14:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oonagh 15:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luc Viatour 18:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - species should be identified Tbc 09:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Normally I would agree (very much so, even), but here, the subject is more generic, it's not about the specific species but an example of climber tendrils in general. I doubt ayone could identify the species based on this part alone. DirkvdM 12:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - This is a very beautiful and interesting picture, but it is unidentified and the resolution is a little low. Fix one or both and I'd support. Ram-Man 12:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

( Support Very cool! pfctdayelise (translate?) 03:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- agree with Lycaon! -- Boereck 08:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support great photo - wonderful composition. --AngMoKio 12:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support My thoughts - pro and con - have been dealt with by others. /Dcastor 23:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unidentified, low resolution, background is a bit disruptive. Not very obvious what exactly is on the photo --Leclerc 16:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sh@ry tales 17:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with the opposers Roger McLassus 20:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured Roger McLassus