Support Haven't seen such an old picture with such great sharpness and resolution. Would be nice to clone out the text at the bottom though. --Calibas (talk) 01:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting historical document of good technical quality. The text at the bottom is integral part of the document, so certainly do not remove it! License problem? Maybe, but probably not. If the name of the photographer is known, the work is copyrighted till 70 years after his dead. Otherwise, one can assume that a picture of more than 100 years old belongs to the public domain. As long as the photographer is not known and it isn't proved that somebody has some rights on that picture, it can be considered as public domain. -- MJJR (talk) 20:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing quality (sharp, low noise, no tilt, good exposure etc.) and attractive overall. The thumbnail doesn't do it justice. Benh (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]