Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Sunset clouds and crepuscular rays over pacific.jpg

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 04:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 04:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is it possible to fix the tilted/warped horizon? – flamurai 11:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know what tilted mean, but I am not sure what is "tilted/wraped". Do you believe the image should be turned to one side? Which one? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warp not wrap --Richard Bartz (talk) 17:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I did my best to fix it with this edit. I am not officially nominating it, just demonstrating what I thought was wrong with it. – flamurai 17:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thank you. Why don't you want to nominate it?--Mbz1 (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I was just going to let you nominate it if you wanted to. – flamurai 17:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard already did. Thank you to both of you.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 08:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Mbz1 (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support throw my hat in the ring. – flamurai 04:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shows the effect very well. --norro (talk) 08:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support As Norro. Vassil (talk) 11:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality: red line on the horizon, blurry clouds and on top of that smallish size. Lycaon (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I guess the red line is just yet another seldom optical effect captured by Mbz1 ;) --norro 22:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~ Idiot (talk) 14:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too much contrast and too little contrast in the same time (no I am not kidding), dull. Crapload (talk) 01:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice --.snoopy. 08:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer (talk) 08:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Mbz1 (talk) 18:39, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Did the birds really have auras around them? --Calibas (talk) 01:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am afraid I cannot answer your question. The image was taken in good old days, when I knew nothing about Commons :=). These days I've never kept my originals (there was no reason for me to keep them), but only downsample edits. IMO the effect you're talking about might be a real thing, which could appear, if one takes an image against the sun, but of course it also could be from post processing.Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose weird colours, glowing birds and noisy. --norro (talk) 08:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessing has caused glowing birds--MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like dark ambiences. Vassil (talk) 11:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unless the birds are in fact the Holy Spirit ;-) Then it will be extremely bloody valuable and proof of the second coming (no, the Bible does not mention glowing birds last time I checked, but we could look at the Apocalypse as a metaphor). Otherwise, overprocessed. ;-) Freedom to share (talk) 21:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very nice, very nice! Booksworm (talk) 11:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~ Idiot (talk) 14:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 08:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]