Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Sunset hdr.jpg

Info Uploaded and nominated by Fir0002 (self nom)
Support --Fir0002 www 03:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chrizz 13:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Support very beautiful, I quickly will study technique HDR! --Luc Viatour 18:27, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support The point of FP's is to encourage people to take more photos/do more pictures. Although this shot is beautiful and not very informative, it would still go under valuable in this context. It just says to people - look, if a sixteen-year old can do this, so can you! It encourages them to take their camera and do something amazing, something that anyone seeing it will vote for it as an FP. Everyone is capable of that. They just do not know it. Now, finally, for the resolution, it is a tough one. It is too low to show that many details. Yet we must not forget - Fir0002 wrote on his userpage he does not have the right facilities to upload such high resolution pictures. Once he does, we just put in a new and delist the old one. This is my view of how Wikimedia Commons works, therefore I have nothing else to say other than declare my support for this fantastic photograph. Freedom to share 19:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I beleive that what we see in this picture is far from what it was in reality. This picture is an improper combination of several shots. Olegivvit 09:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tested the HDR in my office (this morning). It is right techic nothing to lose image, but nothing is invented!

Exemple:over-exposed,under-exposed,HDR (really as in truth) --Luc Viatour 11:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea.. HDR should bring out the true range of brightness as opposed to the opposite. See en:High dynamic range imaging. I think it's great. I don't get your whole "improper combination" theory. Sasquatch 03:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fir0002, could you give here one of the shots composed to make this image (with medium exposition)?

Thank you. Now I can explain my point of view better. We have here two fragments of normal and composed images. What we see in the center of the first one? Deep sky. What is in the center of the other one? Black cloud! Is it real? No. The same thing is for all other black thin clouds on the background of blue sky. In addition, usual clouds look like pained with black. There is no such a problem with the normal image. Exactly those features make the composed picture special, at the same time they are artificial.

Support Nice use of HDR. Well done. Sasquatch 03:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --- gildemax 21:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Artificial, but beautiful creation and exemple of HDR. El Comandante Hasta ∞ 20:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Artistic --Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 12:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 8   Support, 1   Oppose and 0   Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 08:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]