Info created by CristianChirita - uploaded by CristianChirita - nominated by diego_pmc -- diego_pmc (talk ) 18:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support -- diego_pmc (talk ) 18:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose (formerly FPX ) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Image is too small. Please read the guidelines before nominating. Lycaon (talk ) 18:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Deleted FPX, IHMO this image is nice and size is not substantial here. --Karelj
Oppose There are no "strong mitigating reasons" for this image to be smaller than the minimum 2Mpx. --MichaelMaggs (talk ) 20:33, 2 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose I think it's too small, maybe, it would have been acceptable if the quality was better -- sanchezn (talk ) 20:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Would have ignored size issues, but the picture is blurry, probably because it was run through a median filter. ~ trialsanderrors (talk ) 21:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose , I agree with MichaelMaggs. This is a regular picture of a regular subject, so no reason to allow it to be smaller than 2 megapixels. --Aqwis (talk ) 21:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support FP JukoFF (talk )
Oppose - Too small. - Anonymous Dissident Talk 06:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Albertus teolog (talk ) 12:55, 3 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose too small --Base64 (talk ) 13:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Too small. Better resolution and such a image would be FP for me. The composition looks great with the clouds :-) --Aktron (talk ) 16:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose if only it was bigger --SuperJew (talk ) 17:54, 6 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
result: 4 supports, 9 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured. Benh (talk ) 19:36, 11 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]