Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Gutweed at high tide and low tide

edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2018 at 21:06:16 (UTC)

  • Not in a vote for a set, but I tend to feel similarly. I think that if these two photos are made into a single composite photo, that could be a good VI (VIC doesn't accept sets anymore because of some technical problem). I'd consider supporting the second photo for FP, but probably not the first. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment I'm a little surprised by this. Normally voters tend to want plants to be at their best, looking as good and natural as possible. In this case that would be the left photo, I thought it would be the right one that would have a hard time. But if it is the general feeling, sure, I can withdraw this and submit just the right-hand one. That would also leave me free to later submit a photo of the high tide version that I think is better, just not as an identify species photo. --Cart (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment I actually like the lefthand one more ... the other one has some sections of the plant that seem posterized. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Daniel, the parts of the algae that are not filled with the produced oxygen are thin as film, so a couple of layers of them, as there is in some places, creates a very homogenous patch that looks like a posterized part. That's what's happening. Not the easiest growing thing to deal with though. Anyway, it might be better to do these one by one. --Cart (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]