Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Bufo periglenes1.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2010 at 13:40:04

Info No longer up to quality standards, even in thumbnail. A funny haze across the subject, and the toe is cut off. (Original nomination)
Delist -- 99of9 (talk) 13:40, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist No doubt. -- H005 20:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - It is a scan from a slide, with lots of dust specks. Also lacking location information. - MPF (talk) 22:55, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The quality isn't extremely bad, and I think the value of this far outweighs the quality. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 03:51, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No longer up to quality standards, even in thumbnail. --Phyrexian (talk) 13:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Cayambe (talk) 10:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - good educational value and still widely used, but not FP quality. Jonathunder (talk) 02:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cody escadron delta (talk) 10:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:17, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 2 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]