Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 16 2021
-
- Nomination Benches in the Holy Cross chapel (Holy Cross Chapel) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia. Germany --XRay 03:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar candles in the Holy Cross chapel (Holy Cross Chapel) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia. Germany --XRay 03:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Burning candle --XRay 03:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bicycle stand at Vischering Castle in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mirror Lake in Yosemite National Park, California, USA --XRay 03:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rue Paul Foussat in Uzes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 3 rue Paul-Foussat in Uzes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 3 rue Paul-Foussat in Uzes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 3 rue Paul-Foussat in Uzes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 3 rue Paul-Foussat in Uzes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 03:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blooming forsythia bush in a hedge on Hans Pruscha Weg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vernal Hans-Pruscha-Weg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature park at the Landscape Protection Area on peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salix caprea at the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Park at the Landscape Protection Area on the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Klofningsviti Lighthouse on Klofningur, near Flatey Island, Iceland --GRDN711 01:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice atmosphere and sharp enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 02:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Tagliaferri fountain in Brescia. --Moroder 19:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paolo Tosio street in Brescia. --Moroder 19:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gaomei Wetlands, Taichung, Taiwan. --和平奮鬥救地球 06:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The most interesting subject is the pier and the people on it, but that's unsharp, with the focus on the water closer to the viewer. In addition, there's a lot of chromatic aberration on the undersides of the pier and the people on it, especially the closest ones. -- Ikan Kekek 08:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great dome of MIT, Feb 2021. --和平奮鬥救地球 06:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 07:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The dawn at Hehuan East Peak. --和平奮鬥救地球 06:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Really striking as a thumbnail but way too noisy for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Theatro del Lago in Frutillar at Lake Llanquihue --Ermell 06:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support You might see whether you can decrease the noise on and above the pillars, but otherwise, really high quality and beautiful. Please correct the spelling of "teatro" in the filename after the photo passes. -- Ikan Kekek 08:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Done
Thanks for the hint and the review.--Ermell 14:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment You darkened the area, but I do prefer the overall effect now. -- Ikan Kekek 21:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nuremberg Gate in Höchstadt an der Aisch --Ermell 06:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town tower of Prichsenstadt --Ermell 06:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Main object is in focus. --Tournasol7 10:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rectory in Scheinfeld --Ermell 06:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality and very nice. --Tournasol7 10:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential house in Wiesentheid --Ermell 06:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 07:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Hauptstraße 3 in Rottweil, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Wintergasse 20 in Öhringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Schaitbergerstraße 18 in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 07:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination SPITS SCHUUR, KNRM Hindeloopen station.
--Famberhorst 05:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination SPITS SCHUUR, KNRM Hindeloopen station.
-
- Nomination Saint Joseph, Chapel on the Michaelsberg, Untergrombach, Germany --Llez 04:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Virgate Rock Snail, Tylothais virgata --Llez 04:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red-throated loon in Red Hook, Brooklyn --Rhododendrites 22:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cube houses of Rotterdam --Trougnouf 19:12, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corner view of St Benet's Chapel showing the non-obvious chapel to the rear, with its bell-cote. --Rodhullandemu 18:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ski Slope ŚrodulaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Stimoroll 15:16, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, nice composition and atmosphere, but please eliminate the COM:OVERCAT. You might be able to add other relevant categories, but you can't have a subcategory of Sosnowiec and the parent category. -- Ikan Kekek 05:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Done. I've found few more specific. --Stimoroll 11:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Thanks. Reflections of mountains is an overstatement, but I'm satisfied. -- Ikan Kekek 21:45, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gettysburg Seminary Building, Pennsylvania --Acroterion 01:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 16:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two candles. Erzya universal prayer (Rasken Ozks). the village of Chukaly, Mordovia, Russia --Erzianj jurnalist 11:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion It is hanging to the left --Michielverbeek 11:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)} @Michielverbeek: Done the perspective is correct now--Erzianj jurnalist 21:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Ok,now --Michielverbeek 05:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hospital Building. Rasskazovo, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 09:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
The categorisation should be more precise. --Ermell 21:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Done I added several categories. --Alexander Novikov 08:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Thank you, but there ist still a red one left. --Ermell 06:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rekola School in Vantaa, Finland --Ximonic 01:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frost by User:Nata Mostova --Anntinomy 16:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose DoF too shallow. f/16 with a slower shutter speed would work better. The Categories are overly broad. --Tagooty 08:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mahout scrubbing camp elephant in Moyar River, Mudumalai, India. --Tagooty 15:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, nice subject. There is some motion blur, but it is not critical for this photo. --LexKurochkin 10:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 110 ans de l'automobile au Grand Palais - Bugatti Grand Prix Type 51 Biplace - 1933 (by Thesupermat) --Sebring12Hrs 16:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Ice formations on the shore in the Drammen fjord.--Peulle 13:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ice formations on the shore in the Drammen fjord.--Peulle 13:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
Consensual review
editFile:Taraxacumofficinale-MarChiquita-BsaS.jpg
edit- Nomination Taraxacum officinale, dandelion in Mar Chiquita, Argentina --Ezarate 21:39, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- CommentToo much irrelevant image information. The object fills only a small part of the image. --F. Riedelio 06:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done another crop done --Ezarate 11:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done another crop done --Ezarate 11:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, it just seems pretty soft for the small resolution. --Rhododendrites 03:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Rhododendrites. Common flower, should be sharper. -- Ikan Kekek 05:44, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I like the first version for it's special composition and nice, soft lighting. The quality was completely sufficient for this. For the current crop with the focus on the flower, the quality is not enough. --Smial 10:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Family_center_Kazan_-_the_Cup.jpg
edit- Nomination Family Center "Kazan" (colloquially just "The Cup"), the main wedding palace (registry office) in the city of Kazan. --Reda Kerbouche 07:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:39, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment You need a personality rights template on this photo. -- Ikan Kekek 21:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The verticals should be corrected. --Ermell 22:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- New version @Ikan Kekek: the personality rights is added.
- @Ermell: I correct the perspective --Reda Kerbouche 06:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support One of the lamps is leaning, but I suppose that's true to life. Thanks for adding the template. -- Ikan Kekek 07:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support Terrible architecture, but quality is okay. --A.Savin 12:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --LexKurochkin 18:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Fallätsche_cleared_out_pano_20210330.jpg
edit- Nomination High-resolution panorama of Fallätsche from Zürich Leimbach --Domob 16:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Insufficient quality. Not very sharp, sorry --Moroder 20:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Given the resolution, I think it should be fine (even if it looks soft at 100%). Please discuss. --Domob 04:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I agree. The quality seems good enough. One question, though: This is real bluegrass? A lot of it looks pretty blue. -- Ikan Kekek 06:11, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment You mean the grass in the shade in the foreground? Maybe the WB is off, but to me it looks fine. (I can certainly adapt the WB of course, if you think it is too blue.) --Domob 16:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the grass in the foreground. If you remember it looking that blue, fine. -- Ikan Kekek 16:42, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment You mean the grass in the shade in the foreground? Maybe the WB is off, but to me it looks fine. (I can certainly adapt the WB of course, if you think it is too blue.) --Domob 16:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Really OK for QI. (I have to confess that I do not understand why this photo was stiched: 58 megapixels of resolution are not that special anymore, the motif does not show interesting details, and the sharpness is OK, but not outstanding, so I see no benefits from all the time and effort necessary for the stiching. Sorry, just a remark, no offence!) --Aristeas 09:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment That is a good remark ;) My camera has only 16 MP, so with stitching, I was at least for my own possibilities able to get a bit more detail (which I find interesting here, even if the scene is not outstanding, e.g. because of the marked huts and also because I mainly wanted to document the state of this area after the clearing of trees). However, I overestimated the solid angle of the area from the view point, and should have taken a longer lens with me; maybe I'll try that again just for fun, also perhaps trying to find a better viewpoint. --Domob 14:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Much room for improvement: The blueish cast of the shadows in the foreground should be handled with a gradient filter and selective white balance there. Composition should be improved: Too much sky, I would crop the sky in the same proportion as the grass in the foreground. The shadow trees in the foreground look unpleasant to me, probably due to the massive shadow increasement. IMHO not fixable because of the high contrast situation. --Tuxyso 19:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support There are some small burnt highlights and the lighting is not very pleasant. The blueish cast in the forground appears natural. Shadow area under blue sky. I would crop it to a smaller stripe, so it is not as prominent. Sharpness is good enough for QI. I'm fine with the blue sky, that's not a quality issue, but pure matter of taste. I would not ask for advanced image editing for QIC. Global white balance, a little contrast adjustment if necessary, removing lateral CA, straightening perspective in an appropriate way (and by that I do NOT mean that everything has to be forcibly verticalised), i.e. measures that can be achieved in the basic functions of most image editors via sliders, that must be enough. --Smial 00:07, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --LexKurochkin 18:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)