Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 19 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Buddhist_deities_Names_Boulder.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Names of Buddhist deities written on Boulders at Shey Palace near Shey Monastery --Eatcha 06:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Details missing. Would be better with closer aperture and for example ISO 100. --XRay 05:38, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. --Chenspec 09:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - These stones look strange to me, so I feel like they have some strange-looking noise. -- Ikan Kekek 07:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Heavy overprocessing/oversharpening. --Smial 13:51, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Smial.--Peulle 14:51, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:59, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Field_near_the_Boé.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Field near the Boé (Hamoir, Wallonia, Belgium). --PJDespa 18:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO too dark. May be it's too soft too. --XRay 05:24, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
      Support I disagree. --Chenspec 09:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
      Support - I'm unconvinced it's too dark for 15:15 on December 26 in Belgium, and I like the feel and composition. I do think there are some quality problems at full size, but overall, I think it's a QI, and besides, it looks quite good to me at 300% of full screen on my 13-inch laptop. -- Ikan Kekek 07:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan. --Smial 13:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Per others -- Piotr Bart 21:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:59, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Balearica_regulorum,20180902_p5.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Balearica_regulorum, Grey crowned crane, at Tuzoofari, Hidalgo, Mexico: --Cvmontuy 20:40, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 21:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. There's CA and the head is blurred.--Peulle 23:15, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good and interesting photo. However, if I look at the head of the bird larger than it really does, then there is actually a slight blur. -- Spurzem 12:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I think this might be a useful VI, but on the whole, I don't think the head is sharp enough for QI, as this is a big bird. From w:Grey crowned crane: "The grey crowned crane is about 1 m (3.3 ft) tall, weighs 3.5 kg (7.7 lbs), and has a wingspan of 2 m (6.5 ft)." -- Ikan Kekek 07:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Peulle Poco a poco 17:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 21:00, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Spitzkoppe,_Namibia,_2018-08-04,_DD_52.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Spitzkoppe, Namibia --Poco a poco 19:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Overexposed. --Peulle 19:55, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 14:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
    It was not overexposed, I'd have called it "bright", anyhow, I have uploaded a new version --Poco a poco 19:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Despite some slight blur at the left margin the very first version was the best. --Smial 10:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good image -- Spurzem 16:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell 08:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)