Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 26 2017

Consensual review edit

File:View_of_Stockholm-170349.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View from Stockholm City Hall, Stockholm, Sweden. --Josve05a 04:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Strong oppose. Insufficient quality. The alignment isn´t correct. And it´s full of artefacts. Especially the sky is very noisy. --Milseburg 13:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Milseburg. -- Ikan Kekek 06:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Milseburg.--Peulle 15:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 16:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Niederlausitz Senftenberg 07-2015 img2 Amtsgericht.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Senftenberg (Brandenburg): courthouse --A.Savin 10:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment The lens flare in the sky should be removed IMO--Ermell 10:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment I don't understand the objection and hereby ask for third opinion. --A.Savin 22:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support ... as I can't see any lens flare. @Ermell: Could you mark the lens flare with a note, please? This could make me change my mind and would help to fix the image if necessary. Thanks in advance! --Basotxerri 08:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done Thanks Johann Jaritz for the note. --A.Savin 09:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
U r welcome A.Savin-- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Johann Jaritz! I thought it was a cloud   --Basotxerri 17:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality.--Ermell 10:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Very good now. -- Ikan Kekek 06:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 16:18, 25 April 2017 (UTC)