Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 10 2022

Consensual review

edit

File:Exterior_of_Temple_Expiatori_del_Sagrat_Cor_03.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Details of column of Temple Expiatori del Sagrat Cor, Barcelona --Jsamwrites 07:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose Not sharp enough, sorry. --Tournasol7 08:07, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
      Done Fixed. --Jsamwrites 21:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, I agree it's not sharp, it probably needed a higher f/stop. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Little_Cormorant_Flight_Silhouette_Srirangapatna_Jul22_D72_24528.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Little cormorant (Phalacrocorax niger) in flight, silhouette. Kaveri river, Srirangapatna --Tagooty 03:09, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --XRay 03:33, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
      Oppose too blurred and too dark --Charlesjsharp 16:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
      Oppose per Charles. If it were sharper but dark, it could work well as a silhouette, but I don't think this is convincing. -- Ikan Kekek 18:05, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Dark and blurred --Jakubhal 18:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
    This is a silhouette so the bird must be dark! --Tagooty 05:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
    Still it is blurred and does not work for me. Sorry --Jakubhal 08:03, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:22, 9 August 2022 (UTC)