Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 15 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Spencer_Building_Vancouver_03.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination The Landing Building (left) and Spencer building (right), Vancouver, Canada --Xicotencatl 02:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blue fringe very disturbing. Unnecessarily tilted.--Jebulon 09:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose because of tilt. --SkywalkerPL 09:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 16:07, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Wuppertal_-_Engels-Haus_02_ies.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Engels-Haus im Historischen Zentrum, Wuppertal By User:Ies --Atamari 17:49, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Too unsharp. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 02:43, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I think it is sharp enough for QI. Please discuss -- Spurzem 19:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I would expect more details for its size. --Xicotencatl 20:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough. -- Smial 01:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough. --Christian Ferrer 18:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose This kind of static object should/could be sharper IMO. --Jebulon 19:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too unsharp for static object. --Shansov.net 16:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   ----Hubertl 16:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)