Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 25 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Vancouver_(BC,_Canada),_Stanley_Park,_Ufer_zum_Hafen_--_2022_--_2054.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Shore to the port in the Stanley Park in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada --XRay 04:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose the bird is rather blurry --Charlesjsharp 09:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
    •   Done Thank you for your review. I've sharpened the bird. --XRay 09:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment I set this to "Discuss". --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

File:BMW_M5,_IAA_2017,_Frankfurt_(1Y7A3291).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination BMW M5 backup camera, IAA 2017 --MB-one 18:28, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Not a QI of a rear view camera, the crop is randomed and the detail of the camera low, sorry --Poco a poco 19:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
    •   Comment I disagree. The crop is selected purposefully and the camera is shown in ample detail at full res. --MB-one 19:27, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per above. Oppose. Vincent Vega 07:54, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. The image is obviously distorted and the blue in the BMW-logo seems too bright. -- Spurzem 10:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Open_wing_Mud_puddling_activity_of_Moduza_procris_(Cramer,_1777)_-_Commander_WLB.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Open wing Mud puddling activity of Moduza procris (Cramer, 1777) - Commander. (by Anitava Roy) --Atudu 11:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality, but must be upscaled --Charlesjsharp 15:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose In my opinion, an upscaled image should not be promoted. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Weststrasse_27,_29_&_31_in_Bern_(2022).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Residential houses Weststrasse 27-31 in Bern, built 1914-15 --JoachimKohler-HB 01:35, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Crop of the chimney seems rather unfortunate. --1234qwer1234qwer4 17:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Question The tight cropping is not pretty, but not a crucial problem. But why only about 8 MPixels from a camera that can deliver 20 Mpixels? The subject and the lighting conditions don't really justify a strong downscaling. --Smial 12:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Corno Bianco.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination: Corno Bianco (Weisshorn) mountain in Aldino, Italy. By User:Giac83 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Lacking in detail. The small file size indicates that it may have been exported with low quality. --Tagooty 09:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment The image seems to be uploaded with native resolution of the camera. I actually don't think the detail is too bad, at least the photographer didn't make any real mistakes in 2006. Admittedly, I don't find the revised version from 2017 successful. I would like to see a version with less contrast increase and without significant change in color balance. --Smial 12:47, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)