Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 12 2014

Consensual review edit

File:Moscow_GrandKremlinPalace_1306.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Facade fragment of Grand Kremlin Palace, Moscow. By User:Ludvig14 --Brateevsky 15:18, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline The upper horizontal line is distorted (Cushion distortion). Fixable? --Cayambe 17:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
    I think this thing is insignificant (for overall quality of photo). --Brateevsky 06:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

  Oppose That said Cayambe naturally is right,insignificant is your answer --Livioandronico2013 08:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Livioandronico2013 09:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Polanica-Zdrój,_kościół_Wniebowzięcia_NMP_04.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Church of the Assumption in Polanica-Zdrój 5 --Jacek Halicki 17:22, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    Could you brighten the low levels please? Mattbuck 19:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Done--Jacek Halicki 00:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)  Oppose Composition issue. Bad crop at left, we don't see the back of the church.--Jebulon 18:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
    I think the composition is ok. I would support but I have just uploaded my own version of it so I have a COI. --Mattbuck 21:44, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Christian Ferrer 18:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Livioandronico2013 08:02, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Poco a poco 10:29, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 09:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Alemania_vs_Italia_-_2014_CERH_European_Championship_-_11.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Picture of the day (6Dec). Karschau and Motaran in a Germany vs Italy, roller hockey. -- Kadellar 09:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. -- FritsHG 9:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose Not an appropriate description. Too much motion blur. --Cccefalon 10:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose Too much motion blur.--Livioandronico2013 10:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
      Support --Christian Ferrer 13:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
    The description that counts is the one on the image description, not this one, but I changed this one. What do you mean about motion blur? I hope you're not missing that it is a panning shot of people moving very quickly in many different directions (legs, arms, bodies, heads). --Kadellar 16:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
    Thank you for changing the description according to nomination rules. However, I'm not a friend of too much motion blur in sports motifs but I don't want to appear unfair and hence leave this discussion with a   Neutral vote. --Cccefalon 20:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support as per Cccefalon. Yann 10:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality for what it is.Crisco 1492 06:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Both faces unsharp. -- Smial 13:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support This shot is tricky, given the conditions it deserves the QI stamp IMHO Poco a poco 10:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   -- Poco a poco 10:20, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Cuervo_(Corvus_corax),_Palacio_de_Nymphenburg,_Múnich,_Alemania.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Crow (Corvus corax), Nymphenburg Palace, Munich, Germany. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Not so good quality. --FritsHG 08:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support excuse meFritsHG but why "Not so good quality"? I'm curious --Livioandronico2013 09:21, 6 December 2014
  •   Supportgood quality, not so good Angleמינוזיג 17:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)(UTC)
  Support Quality almost perfect --The Photographer 11:53, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   -- Poco a poco 10:21, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Argiope pulchella.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Argiope pulchella --Vengolis 03:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Nice. Popo le Chien 17:21, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp and overexposed. --Hockei 19:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Hockei --Livioandronico2013 14:12, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose CA and very noisy, not a QI Poco a poco 10:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   -- Poco a poco 10:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Argiope aemula 1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Argiope aemula (female) --Vengolis 03:14, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Nice. Popo le Chien 17:21, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp, noisy and overexposed. --Hockei 19:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Hockei--Livioandronico2013 21:50, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blurry, definitely not a QI Poco a poco 10:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   -- Poco a poco 10:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)