Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 03 2017

Consensual review edit

File:London-Skyline-P1140375.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination London skyline with the Blackfriars bridge --Ermell 16:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, I disagree yet. The building on the right is obviously tilted to the left. And there is some unpleasant noise over the trees on the the left. --Milseburg 12:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment I agree Milseburg. And I see some dust spots. Sky and tilt can be fixed, I think. -- DerFussi 06:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
    •   Comment New version uploaded. Please have a look.--Ermell 08:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 22:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

File:White-throated_kingfisher_near_village_Zulamgarh,_Ludhiana_district,_Punjab.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination White-throated kingfisher near Zulamgarh, Ludhiana district, Punjab --Satdeep Gill 17:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not QI for me. Charlesjsharp 19:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Question Reason?--Ermell 20:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - The bird looks clear enough for QI, in my opinion, and the composition is nice. -- Ikan Kekek 21:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  • not sharp enough, particularly the eyes. Charlesjsharp 21:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  • I do think it's a close case, so a discussion is appropriate. -- Ikan Kekek 22:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Livioandronico2013 09:57, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Quality is OK for me. But I'd like to see category on location, if possible also geotag. --A.Savin 16:40, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
    •   Done I have geotagged and also added category on location --Satdeep Gill 06:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
      •   Support --A.Savin 15:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 17:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 22:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)