Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 14 2014

< Commons:Quality images candidates
  • * Nomination Greek flag --Taxiarchos228 21:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good --AntanO 03:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Greek flag --Taxiarchos228 21:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good --AntanO 03:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rethymno: Turkish house (detail) --Taxiarchos228 21:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rethymno: Turkish house (detail) --Taxiarchos228 21:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Horseshoe Lake's activity centre at Yateley Complex --Lewis Hulbert 21:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Horseshoe Lake's activity centre at Yateley Complex --Lewis Hulbert 21:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Boat pier in Bophut village, Ko Samui, Thailand --Rutake 21:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Boat pier in Bophut village, Ko Samui, Thailand --Rutake 21:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sabine Wils is a german politician (DIE LINKE). 2014 she is a member of the European Parliament (since 2009). --Isiwal 21:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sabine Wils is a german politician (DIE LINKE). 2014 she is a member of the European Parliament (since 2009). --Isiwal 21:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Two postboxes in Hartley Wintney --Lewis Hulbert 21:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Two postboxes in Hartley Wintney --Lewis Hulbert 21:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hermitage of St Peter, Tepeyahualco, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Hermitage of St Peter, Tepeyahualco, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Chateau Schloß Maurach, district Bodenseekreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --DKrieger 18:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Chateau Schloß Maurach, district Bodenseekreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --DKrieger 18:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Santa Cruz de La Palma (Canary Islands): Castillo de la Virgen -- MJJR 17:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Santa Cruz de La Palma (Canary Islands): Castillo de la Virgen -- MJJR 17:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Santa Cruz de La Palma (Canary Islands): Castillo de la Virgen -- MJJR 17:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support --Iifar 19:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Santa Cruz de La Palma (Canary Islands): Castillo de la Virgen -- MJJR 17:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support --Iifar 19:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Pair of Mandarins (Aix galericulata). By User:Baresi franco --Lewis Hulbert 17:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ulu Dusun, Sabah, Malaysia: St. Paul's Catholic Church --Cccefalon 17:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support --Iifar 19:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ulu Dusun, Sabah, Malaysia: St. Paul's Catholic Church --Cccefalon 17:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support --Iifar 19:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Pediment of the Hippocrates thermal center, Saujon, Charente-Maritime, France. --JLPC 17:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 17:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Pediment of the Hippocrates thermal center, Saujon, Charente-Maritime, France. --JLPC 17:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 17:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wayside wrought iron cross, Chalais, Charente, France. --JLPC 17:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wayside wrought iron cross, Chalais, Charente, France. --JLPC 17:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Pediment of the post-office with COA and motto ; Saujon, Charente-Maritime, France.. --JLPC 17:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 17:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Pediment of the post-office with COA and motto ; Saujon, Charente-Maritime, France.. --JLPC 17:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 17:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Tabakfabrik Linz during Ars Electronica 2013. --Tsui 16:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support QI (I would suggest to remove the "something" in the upper right) --P e z i 17:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)  Comment Removed the something (balloons I guess). --Tsui 20:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Tabakfabrik Linz during Ars Electronica 2013. --Tsui 16:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support QI (I would suggest to remove the "something" in the upper right) --P e z i 17:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
       Comment Removed the something (balloons I guess). --Tsui 20:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Catholic Church St. Augustine in Kinarut, Sabah --Cccefalon 15:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Catholic Church St. Augustine in Kinarut, Sabah --Cccefalon 15:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Roman Catholic Chapel St. Joseph's in Kg. Kokol, Menggatal, Sabah --Cccefalon 15:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Roman Catholic Chapel St. Joseph's in Kg. Kokol, Menggatal, Sabah --Cccefalon 15:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Two of the winged Victories at the Vittoriano, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 14:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Sehr schöne Bildaufteilung. Das Bild zieht den Blick an, es ist "was Anderes" - sorry for german, this i cant write in english. --Ralf Roletschek 14:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Two of the winged Victories at the Vittoriano, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 14:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Sehr schöne Bildaufteilung. Das Bild zieht den Blick an, es ist "was Anderes" - sorry for german, this i cant write in english. --Ralf Roletschek 14:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Columns and perspective, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 14:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion --Villy Fink Isaksen 14:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Columns and perspective, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 14:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion --Villy Fink Isaksen 14:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cola di Rienzo, statue, Capitole Hill, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 14:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cola di Rienzo, statue, Capitole Hill, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 14:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The roman she-wolf, Romulus and Remus, Capitoline replica, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 14:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion OK --JLPC 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination The roman she-wolf, Romulus and Remus, Capitoline replica, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 14:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK --JLPC 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Watergate Place apartments, Melbourne. --Elekhh 13:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Crop at the top left could be a bit wider. --Tuxyso 13:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Watergate Place apartments, Melbourne. --Elekhh 13:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Crop at the top left could be a bit wider. --Tuxyso 13:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Laura Sarah de Gunzburg et Ganjana 2 --Pleclown 12:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion original composition --Pyb 14:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Laura Sarah de Gunzburg et Ganjana 2 --Pleclown 12:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion original composition --Pyb 14:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Laura Sarah de Gunzburg et Ganjana 2 --Pleclown 12:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Pyb 14:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Laura Sarah de Gunzburg et Ganjana 2 --Pleclown 12:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Pyb 14:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination An overview over the Rheingau from Hallgarten, shortly after sunset in November 2013 --DXR 11:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Withdrawn
  • * Nomination SR-24 (cropped and retouched version of image which was posted here a week ago...) --DXR 11:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC) Good to, even though it's smaller :) --JLPC 16:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion
    • Nomination SR-24 (cropped and retouched version of image which was posted here a week ago...) --DXR 11:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
      Good to, even though it's smaller :) --JLPC 16:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion
  • * Nomination Statue of Nicholas I in Saint Petersburg, Russia (photo by Kora27) --A.Savin 11:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Statue of Nicholas I in Saint Petersburg, Russia (photo by Kora27) --A.Savin 11:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Castor and Pollus, the Dioscures, Capitole Hille, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 10:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Castor and Pollus, the Dioscures, Capitole Hille, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 10:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Jesuit Church, Dr.-Ignaz-Seipel-Platz, Vienna --P e z i 09:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Jesuit Church, Dr.-Ignaz-Seipel-Platz, Vienna --P e z i 09:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Baobab dans le delta de l'Okavango - Botswana --BluesyPete 09:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose strong artefacts on the sky --A.Savin 11:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Baobab dans le delta de l'Okavango - Botswana --BluesyPete 09:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose strong artefacts on the sky --A.Savin 11:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Stock im Eisen square 2, Vienna. --MrPanyGoff 08:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 11:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Stock im Eisen square 2, Vienna. --MrPanyGoff 08:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 11:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination New Theatre, Nottingham. Mattbuck 08:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination New Theatre, Nottingham. Mattbuck 08:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Uphill Junction, Weston-super-Mare. Mattbuck 08:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Uphill Junction, Weston-super-Mare. Mattbuck 08:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The mount Seceda and the Geisler peaks in Gröden --Moroder 07:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination The mount Seceda and the Geisler peaks in Gröden --Moroder 07:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lytse Mâr in de Alde Feanen. Hekwerk.-- Famberhorst 05:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Nice mood. --JLPC 16:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lytse Mâr in de Alde Feanen. Hekwerk.--
      Famberhorst 05:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Nice mood. --JLPC 16:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ouvrages du Libron: Canal du Midi traversing the Libron River near Agde, East view --P e z i 22:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ouvrages du Libron: Canal du Midi traversing the Libron River near Agde, East view --P e z i 22:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Santa Cruz de La Palma (Canary Islands): Castillo de Santa Catalina -- MJJR 22:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion OK for me. --Tuxyso 13:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Santa Cruz de La Palma (Canary Islands): Castillo de Santa Catalina -- MJJR 22:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK for me. --Tuxyso 13:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ouvrages du Libron: Canal du Midi traversing the Libron River near Agde, West view --P e z i 20:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Tuxyso 13:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ouvrages du Libron: Canal du Midi traversing the Libron River near Agde, West view --P e z i 20:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Tuxyso 13:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of St. Catherine of Siena, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Light not as its best, but OK for QI. --Tuxyso 13:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of St. Catherine of Siena, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Light not as its best, but OK for QI. --Tuxyso 13:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of Our Lady of the Ascension, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of Our Lady of the Ascension, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Acosta Mine, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Acosta Mine, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support --A.Savin 11:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ponte Vittorio-Emanuele II, Tiber river, Saint Peter's main cupola, at dusk, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 15:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Could it be that it is slightly tilted cw? --DXR 20:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Oh yes it was ! Thank you very much, and sorry, my mistake. Done Rotated and persp. corrected. I hope it is better.--Jebulon 09:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Very nice now --DXR 12:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ponte Vittorio-Emanuele II, Tiber river, Saint Peter's main cupola, at dusk, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 15:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
      Could it be that it is slightly tilted cw? --DXR 20:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Oh yes it was ! Thank you very much, and sorry, my mistake.✓ Done Rotated and persp. corrected. I hope it is better.--Jebulon 09:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Very nice now --DXR 12:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Die de:Haaler Au in Deutschland, S-H in der flachen Marsch an der Brücke über die Landesstrasse 127 --Nightflyer 23:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose lack of sharpness --A.Savin 13:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Du hast Recht, ich hab nachgeschärft. Der Horizont sieht jetzt weitaus besser aus. --Nightflyer 21:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Vom Schärfen wird das Detail auch nicht besser, das Gras im Hintergrund ist z.B. nach wie vor ziemlich verwaschen und dies ist auch kaum zu korrigieren. --A.Savin 09:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)  InfoDanke für deine Meinung. Markier doch bitte die unscharfen Gebiete. Dann kann ich überlegen, wie man es besser macht. Gruss --Nightflyer 22:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Die de:Haaler Au in Deutschland, S-H in der flachen Marsch an der Brücke über die Landesstrasse 127 --Nightflyer 23:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose lack of sharpness --A.Savin 13:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Du hast Recht, ich hab nachgeschärft. Der Horizont sieht jetzt weitaus besser aus. --Nightflyer 21:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
      Vom Schärfen wird das Detail auch nicht besser, das Gras im Hintergrund ist z.B. nach wie vor ziemlich verwaschen und dies ist auch kaum zu korrigieren. --A.Savin 09:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
       InfoDanke für deine Meinung. Markier doch bitte die unscharfen Gebiete. Dann kann ich überlegen, wie man es besser macht. Gruss --Nightflyer 22:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • ]]. --Tuxyso 20:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)  Support OK --A.Savin 09:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    ]]. --Tuxyso 20:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)  Support OK --A.Savin 09:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • * Nomination The skirun "La Longia" in the "Canyon" in the back the mount Seceda in Gröden --Moroder 17:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 11:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination The skirun "La Longia" in the "Canyon" in the back the mount Seceda in Gröden --Moroder 17:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 11:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wilsill, Yorks. Mattbuck 15:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Overall good quality. However, while one bird is clearly recognised as a bird, the others are only depicted as blurry spots. I suggest to remove them. --Cccefalon 17:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC) I found about 6 in the end. Mattbuck 17:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC) ok now --Cccefalon 13:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wilsill, Yorks. Mattbuck 15:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Overall good quality. However, while one bird is clearly recognised as a bird, the others are only depicted as blurry spots. I suggest to remove them. --Cccefalon 17:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
      I found about 6 in the end. Mattbuck 17:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
      ok now --Cccefalon 13:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Puebla Cathedral, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC) * Decline Even considering the angle of the shot, I think the perspective is too weird; sorry. Also there is too much magenta in the whites. --Cccefalon 08:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Puebla Cathedral, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline Even considering the angle of the shot, I think the perspective is too weird; sorry. Also there is too much magenta in the whites. --Cccefalon 08:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination House in Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Comment there's something in the sky that should be removed IMO (see notice); also a dustspot a bit to the right. Otherwise OK. --P e z i 10:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 20:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC) Support OK now. --P e z i 22:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination House in Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Comment there's something in the sky that should be removed IMO (see notice); also a dustspot a bit to the right. Otherwise OK. --P e z i 10:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Poco a poco 20:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC) Support OK now. --P e z i 22:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lytse Mâr in de de Alde Feanen. --Famberhorst 05:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 10:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lytse Mâr in de de Alde Feanen.
      --Famberhorst 05:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 10:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hamburg, former farm building in Osdorf --Dirtsc 21:48, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Hamburg, former farm building in Osdorf --Dirtsc 21:48, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Chris L. of Agonoize at Amphi Festival 2013, Cologne --Achim Raschka 13:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Chris L. of Agonoize at Amphi Festival 2013, Cologne --Achim Raschka 13:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination AblaZ of Stahlmann at Amphi Festival 2013, Cologne, Germany --Achim Raschka 13:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination AblaZ of Stahlmann at Amphi Festival 2013, Cologne, Germany --Achim Raschka 13:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Phillip Boa with Phillip Boa & the Voodooclub at the Amphi Festival 2013, Cologne --Achim Raschka 13:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Phillip Boa with Phillip Boa & the Voodooclub at the Amphi Festival 2013, Cologne --Achim Raschka 13:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - José Maria Larocca et GDE Matrix --Pleclown 12:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - José Maria Larocca et GDE Matrix --Pleclown 12:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - José Maria Larocca et GDE Matrix --Pleclown 12:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - José Maria Larocca et GDE Matrix --Pleclown 12:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Jos Verlooy et Farfelu de la Pomme --Pleclown 12:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Jos Verlooy et Farfelu de la Pomme --Pleclown 12:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Schwarzenbergplatz 5 in Vienna. --MrPanyGoff 08:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Schwarzenbergplatz 5 in Vienna. --MrPanyGoff 08:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination House Crow (Corvus splendens) --AntanO 08:07, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Decline  Comment overexposed, no ? Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC) I think the exposure is ok, but the bird isn't fully crisp - there's shake or something at the head. Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination House Crow (Corvus splendens) --AntanO 08:07, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline  Comment overexposed, no ? Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
      I think the exposure is ok, but the bird isn't fully crisp - there's shake or something at the head. Mattbuck 21:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination NewarkNorth Gate station. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination NewarkNorth Gate station. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Byland Abbey. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Nice. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Byland Abbey. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Nice. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 170637 at Long Eaton. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion I like it. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination 170637 at Long Eaton. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion I like it. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Worle station. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Worle station. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Grosmont Depot. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 10:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Grosmont Depot. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --P e z i 10:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Front plate of a Bedford Fire Appliance, owned by Felda Vegetable Oil Products Sdn Bhd in Bandar Sahabat, Malaysia --Cccefalon 06:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Front plate of a Bedford Fire Appliance, owned by Felda Vegetable Oil Products Sdn Bhd in Bandar Sahabat, Malaysia --Cccefalon 06:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Temple of St Francis, Mexico City, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion OK, though I think that guy is giving us the evil eye. --Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Indeed... Poco a poco 21:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Temple of St Francis, Mexico City, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK, though I think that guy is giving us the evil eye. --Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
      Indeed... Poco a poco 21:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Guillaume Hennequin et Chairman LS La Silla --Pleclown 12:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Needs a bit of a crop on the left I think, to centre the horse. Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC) I've tried something Pleclown 20:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination 2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Guillaume Hennequin et Chairman LS La Silla --Pleclown 12:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
      Needs a bit of a crop on the left I think, to centre the horse. Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
      I've tried something Pleclown 20:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Balloon at Cardiff Mardi Gras. Mattbuck 08:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Someone please review this, this is about the fifth or sixth time through! Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support ok for me, it's the fisrt time I see it, I do my job --Christian Ferrer 06:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Balloon at Cardiff Mardi Gras. Mattbuck 08:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
      Someone please review this, this is about the fifth or sixth time through! Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support ok for me, it's the fisrt time I see it, I do my job --Christian Ferrer 06:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 91120 at King's Cross. Mattbuck 08:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support good --Christian Ferrer 05:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination 91120 at King's Cross. Mattbuck 08:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support good --Christian Ferrer 05:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Columbus Courtyard. Mattbuck 08:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Columbus Courtyard. Mattbuck 08:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Young malaysian posing in front of a mural in George Town, Malaysia --Cccefalon 06:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Not quite sharp? Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC) * Withdrawn ... you are right. --Cccefalon 06:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Eiffel Tower and Pont de Bir-Hakeim... --DXR 19:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC) IMO bit too dark, and the spire is not really sharp --Taxiarchos228 21:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)  Brightened, regarding the sharpness: It's a 20MP crop from the borders of a 36MP file (can't carry around the 70-200 everyday), it's bound to be somewhat soft, but I don't think it's unreasonably blurry --DXR 21:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC) Brightness is OK, but it's rather green. Mattbuck 22:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Increased magenta tint slightly --DXR 07:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC) * Promotion Better. Mattbuck 21:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Eiffel Tower and Pont de Bir-Hakeim... --DXR 19:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
      IMO bit too dark, and the spire is not really sharp --Taxiarchos228 21:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
      ✓ Brightened, regarding the sharpness: It's a 20MP crop from the borders of a 36MP file (can't carry around the 70-200 everyday), it's bound to be somewhat soft, but I don't think it's unreasonably blurry --DXR 21:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
      Brightness is OK, but it's rather green. Mattbuck 22:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Increased magenta tint slightly --DXR 07:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Promotion Better. Mattbuck 21:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Perissa beach, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 10:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC) * Decline  Comment A bit unsharp IMO --Christian Ferrer 06:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)  Oppose as per Christian. --Cccefalon 07:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Perissa beach, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 10:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline  Comment A bit unsharp IMO --Christian Ferrer 06:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
       Oppose as per Christian. --Cccefalon 07:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Fishbourne Roman Palace. Mattbuck 09:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC) * Decline It's a pity but IMO too small DoF, the 1/3 top seems blurred to me --Christian Ferrer 06:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)  Oppose as per Christian. --Cccefalon 07:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fishbourne Roman Palace. Mattbuck 09:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
    • Decline It's a pity but IMO too small DoF, the 1/3 top seems blurred to me --Christian Ferrer 06:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
       Oppose as per Christian. --Cccefalon 07:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review edit

File:Tithe_Barn_indoors.JPG edit

 

  Oppose .. and too dark and the dark parts noisy --Cccefalon 06:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •   I withdraw my nomination The darkness is intentional, since it shows how dark it is inside a Tudor barn which uses only natural lighting. The noise and sharpness however, is a huge problem. --Lewis Hulbert 10:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cccefalon 06:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stefania_Demetz_FIS_Gröden.JPG edit

 

File:Mury_miejskie_w_Kotorze_05.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination City ​​Walls in Kotor, Montenegro. --Halavar 19:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose strong artefacts, pixalisation --Taxiarchos228 20:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  Support good rework from Christian Ferrer! --Taxiarchos228 12:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment The pic is somewhat soft and seems to have suffered from denoising but not too bad IMHO since it’s quite sharp on the main subjects. I don’t see any artifacts. I’d like to have some more opinions. --Kreuzschnabel 20:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    •   Support Good after rework. --Kreuzschnabel 15:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I love the composition, but I'm just not sure if the image's quality is good enough for QI. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 10:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done New version uploaded by me. Halavar, revert if you don't like --Christian Ferrer 10:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the help Christian Ferrer:) Image looks better. --Halavar 11:51, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --JLPC 08:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Lewis Hulbert 12:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Východočeské muzeum - Cis. kr. poštovní expedice.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Exhibition in Castle Pardubice, Czech Republic --Pudelek 18:11, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)  Oppose burnt out area at lower right, noise in dark areas, rather low resolution: No QI IMO --P e z i 20:14, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As P e z i--Lmbuga 03:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Stratford International station MMB 19.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Stratford International station. Mattbuck 08:03, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
    ccw tilt Poco a poco 22:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
    Are you sure? Mattbuck 21:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
    Well, from this angle I'd expect that the stairs are horizontal, aren't I right? Poco a poco 16:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
    I wasn't looking directly up the stairs, so no. Mattbuck 10:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
    Well, the result to me is a snapshot, with a random angle, not a QI IMHO Poco a poco 08:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Oppose Ccw tilt IMO . Random angle--Lmbuga 21:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Heiligenbildchen_Heilige_Dorothea_Klosterarbeit.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Holy card of Saint Dorothy. Hand cut decoration and hand painted figure early 18th century --Moroder 09:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Oppose unsharp IMO --Christian Ferrer 23:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
    I had not seen that it was a scan, I know nothing about that scan quality --Christian Ferrer 17:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree. What is your criterion to say it is unsharp. The object has the size of 10x 5 cm and has been scanned at 1600 dpi (it is albost under the microscope!) --Moroder 14:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)  Comment Is the object flat or 3D? Flat bed scanners cannot deal with parts distant from the glass. --P e z i 14:39, 5 February 2014 (UTC)   Info it is flat, thin paper --Moroder 17:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support taking your information of the size into consideration I think there is just no more detail in the original object. --P e z i 09:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Yatton railway station MMB 29 150127 153361.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination FGW DMUs at Yatton. Mattbuck 13:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion dark and noisy --Taxiarchos228 19:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
    Brightened and denoised mildly. Mattbuck 22:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
    okay, now --Taxiarchos228 07:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 06:13, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support as the issues obviously are resolved. --Cccefalon 08:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Cccefalon 08:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB D1 River Thames and Palace of Westminster.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination River Thames. Mattbuck 08:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Low quality generalized, ISO 800 is not a good choise. Maybe try again with a tripod --The Photographer 12:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
    Not sure the bridge is stable enough for that, but I don't agree with the low quality comment. Mattbuck 18:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)  Oppose Looks like noise reduction removed lots of details. --P e z i 21:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
    I don't think I did any noise reduction, I don't tend to do that... Mattbuck 22:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
      Support I'm with Mattbuck, noise reduction will not help, it's not very sharp but not very noisy, acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 22:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   strong oppose As Pezi, poor detail (incredible IMO, it's not a good picture, only the composition is good)--Lmbuga 02:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Bodnath Stupa 08.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Bodnath Stupa in Kathmandu --Sebbe xy 00:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Support Well composed shot and interesting subject matter.--Balon Greyjoy 02:23, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose Not a QI to me: tilted and unsharp, the idea is good though --Poco a poco 08:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not QI IMO: Unsharp. Nothing clearly in focus--Lmbuga 21:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Excellent composition but the image is blurred :( --The Photographer 02:41, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Cccefalon 08:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Spgb_triptychon.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination St. Peter (Hamburg-Groß Borstel), Triptychon --Dirtsc 22:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline   Oppose I'm afraid some parts are missing...--Jebulon 21:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
    I changed the crop. --Dirtsc 21:41, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Katy Perry gig Nottingham 2011 MMB 25.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Katy Perry concert in Nottingham. Mattbuck 11:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 12:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
    Sharpened. Mattbuck 18:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Better, but still not good enough IMHO Poco a poco 20:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Carretera_Granma.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The Granma highway near the border of Granma and Santiago de Cuba provinces. --Óðinn 22:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{o}} Problem with the crop, but improvable (see note). Strong artifacts (posterization?) (Sky. see note)--Lmbuga 22:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
      Done - fixed both. --Óðinn 05:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support original composition --Moroder 13:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support QI --P e z i 20:56, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Sorry. Good quality--Lmbuga 11:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Cccefalon 08:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

File:13-11-27-Feuß-Hans-by-RalfR.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Hans Feuß, german politican --Ralf Roletschek 20:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too unsharp IMO --DXR 22:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unsharp and noise --Lmbuga 22:43, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
    • Perhaps the picture can be FP, but not QI IMO--Lmbuga 22:46, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Motion blur in lower part of face. --Kreuzschnabel 15:21, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Cccefalon 08:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Rethymno_-_Neratzes-Moschee5.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mosquee Neratzes, detail --Taxiarchos228 05:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Dust spots. Mattbuck 10:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
    • cleaned --Taxiarchos228 19:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
      • Still many left. Mattbuck 20:54, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
        • please mark them remove them by yourself --Taxiarchos228 20:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
          • Begging for declines? Or just a funny way to say thanks for mentioning issues to improve? --Kreuzschnabel 15:48, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
            • I'm assuming he meant to write "please mark them or remove them by yourself", meaning that he'd be willing if he actually knew where the aforementioned dust spots are. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Mattbuck_ dustspots removed --Taxiarchos228 19:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
    I have removed a few more, unfortunately this means I can not support this image. Mattbuck 21:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
great job (ironic) you have overwritten a version with dustsports over my version without. better you are concentrating on other pictures and let my alone. --Taxiarchos228 20:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
I saved the latest version and edited that, and turned up contrast specifically so I could find the dust spots more easily. You whinge that I don't remove them myself, then you whinge when I do. Quit being such a jerk about things. Mattbuck 21:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Of course, you are uploading a version with dustspots but I am the jerk. I must be a jerk disputing with you. --Taxiarchos228 05:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support QI IMO. --P e z i 21:11, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good --Gauri Wur Sem 14:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose 2 dustspots (see note) on the current version, I oppose until it's fixed --Christian Ferrer 19:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
fixed. --Taxiarchos228 20:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  Support It seems ok now --Christian Ferrer 05:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good now. Lewis Hulbert 16:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Taxiarchos228 21:29, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Rethymno_-_Venezianischer_Hafen2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Rethymno: venetian harbour (lighthouse) --Taxiarchos228 21:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. --P e z i 20:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - This cannot be QI as current - the white background is showing through on the bottom left! Mattbuck 22:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
    done. you´re counting pixels, aren`t you?`--Taxiarchos228 20:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
    No, I'm not. I just look at the image. Mattbuck 17:41, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

But you obviously do not look very carefully at your votings and to change them after the correction. And what you call looking just at an image I call blowing up a trivia. --Taxiarchos228 19:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

  •   Comment Please gentlemen, stick to facts! --P e z i (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
sadly, this are facts --Taxiarchos228 08:44, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Mattbuck again: why aren`t you chancing your contra-voting although you know the base is not valid any more? --Taxiarchos228 21:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Right, so, let me get this straight. You nominate an image with elementary errors for QI. I point out those elementary errors, which are by any standards disqualifying, and because I do that I am... what... persecuting you? Letting details cloud the greater fact? You know what? QI is all about details. Anyone can point a camera at something, get the focus about right and press the shutter. The point of QI is that the images will be of excellent quality, beyond the ordinary, and thus not having any but the most minor problems. Once you're talking QI scale, things like overexposure, incorrect rotation, cropping in the transparency, dust spots, blur - these are all problems which are disqualifying of a candidate image. I'm not being petty or picking on you for this sort of thing, as anyone who's been here a while knows, I'm an equal opportunity ass. If Poco had offered this image, I would have opposed. If Moroder has offered this image, I would have opposed. It doesn't matter who offers such an image, if it has such elementary mistakes it cannot be QI.
As for my not striking my oppose in what you consider a timely manner... yes, that is me intentionally persecuting you, because there is nothing I love more in life than arbitrarily taunting people I don't even know. Mattbuck 22:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Let me get this straight from my point of view. You often criticize petty points. And a hardly to see dust spot e.g. or a few pixel white background are such petty points you criticize. But you are absolutely entitled to criticize it if you discover it. No problem in general with this. By the way: if I discover small issues at QI I don´t give immediately an oppose but I note the issues. But the problem starts here: if you necessarily have to oppose then oppose. But then I expect that you monitor and review this cases and not ignore the correction like you do in many cases. So your apologize in the case below becomes sadly a farce and implausible. As I already said: your behavior does not improve the QI-standards but is a indication of lacking respect and fairness. Because your images are quite far away being that perfect you demand here for nomination. And your answer is nothing but an instance once again of the points I dislike in your "QI reviews". --Taxiarchos228 22:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Sidenote: wiki needs to invent a markup which means "the same indent as the last one".
I apologise for not looking back quickly enough, I don't always remember to look back, but I do try to. I don't always view QI every day for review purposes - I spend 5mins a day before work on nominating, then have a review session every couple of evenings. And I'm human, sometimes I miss things. I don't mean to be petty, and where I think an image is fixable I will comment rather than oppose. Apart from the mistaken crop, I thought this image was excellent, and all I wanted in this case was for that to be fixed. I will reconsider my attitude towards QI reviews, and try to be more courteous in future. Mattbuck 21:42, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
If it happen so this would be great (not ironic). --Taxiarchos228 20:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

  Support Nice!--Moroder 23:15, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  Support Good quality IMO. --Gauri Wur Sem 13:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)   Support Excellent --The Photographer 00:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Taxiarchos228 21:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

File:В. Жыровічы - Ансамбаль Сьвята-Усьпенскага манастыра, званіца PICT3037.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Assumption Monastery in Žyrovičy, Belarus (photo by Argon by) --A.Savin 14:25, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Review   Comment Image needs perspective correction --Halavar 15:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
    The image is nearly straight; if you mean the lantern, it seems to be leaning itself. --A.Savin 16:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
    No only the lantern, but also a tree and right side of house and church. --Halavar 16:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
    I think it's ok. Mattbuck 21:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment Evidently needs a perspective correction on both sides, otherwise nice composition --Moroder 23:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Val_Badia_dl_vieres_de_Gardenazza.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Val Badia in Badia --Moroder 14:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Neutral Two dust spots on the sky (easy to fix), some clipping on the clouds, overall sharpness is not very good. --Iifar 15:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Retouched DSs, OE areas, perspective correction. Thanks --Moroder 18:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
    Dust spots still there, and left side is leaning out IMO. I'd also suggest a general sharpening. Mattbuck 21:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
      Not done Mattbuck 10:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
    It has been corrected on January 23 a new version was uploaded --Moroder 11:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support 40MP, good quality, should really be QI IMO --DXR 17:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Oh, yes Uwe is right. Shouldn't have missed that... Will resupport as soon as his suggestions are applied. --DXR (talk) 23:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Resupported. --DXR 23:34, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose There are still some errors: Posterization of clouds, stitching error and haloing of the mountain ridge (the latter issue is not too strong). I made annotations. Perhaps you can do something to get rid of the flaws? --Cccefalon 19:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done I retouched the clouds, thanks for the hint. In regard to the halo I have to repeat what I already explained several times on QIC that it is a halo of the size of 2-6 pixels(less than 1/1000 of the image size), it is unavoidable on this hi res pictures and it is more evident on strong light interfaces. If you look at this picture you see a halo on the roof of the same size (3-4 pixels) but it is less evident because the light contrast is less but in proportion to the total image size it is much bigger. Besides that, QI guidlines speak of "relevant" errors --Moroder 11:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support As I said, the mountain ridge issue is not too strong and not against promoting the photo. I know, that it occurs every now and then. I just mentioned it, as you were about to rework the photo and possibly you might have tackled it down. The really important flaws are resolved. --Cccefalon 14:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough from my poin of view --PetrVod 21:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jean11 21:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Monumento_a_la_Independencia,_México_D.F.,_México,_2014-10-13,_DD_22.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Independence Monument, Mexico City, Mexico --Poco a poco 10:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support I like the zoom effects. Good quality. --EveryPicture 20:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree "Zoom effects" are disturbing, look like accidently camera move. Also some areas of the main object overexposed/clipping. --Smial 11:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I think that long exposure would have been fine, but the zoom thing is just a bit weird. Mattbuck 17:36, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jean11 21:23, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Rethymno_-_Neratzes-Moschee3.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mosquee Neratzes --Taxiarchos228 05:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Bad crop on left (foot), dust spots, fine detail a bit iffy. --Mattbuck 10:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
    • foot and dust spots erased --Taxiarchos228 19:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
      • Mattbuck: it would be nice if you would notice that your points are cleared not and not ignore this. Regrettably I remarked that you didn't change your votings although the issues are eliminated. It testifies to respekt and fairness not to ignore this. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:46, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
        I apologise for this oversight,   Support now. I would like to say though that you have really been slacking off with your image preparations, they regularly have truly elementary mistakes - such as dust spots - which, given your excellent history of uploads, I would have expected to be fixed before they were nominated. Mattbuck 11:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
        • If I would see them myself, I would erase them and in fact I had cleared already party of the sky before uploading. --Taxiarchos228 12:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support --Moroder 23:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Before, my solely complaints were about dust and leg. Now the quality is good enough for QI. --Cccefalon 18:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Gauri Wur Sem 13:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Taxiarchos228 19:56, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_February_14_2014&oldid=524670920"