Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 04 2016

Consensual review edit

File:Brno View 36.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Místodržitelský Palác Art Gallery Portal Sculpture --Scotch Mist 10:39, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Looks like posterization on statue --Daniel Case 04:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thank you for your review. Think what you may be referring as "posterization' is the 'blotchy' natural colouring/discolouring of what I presume to be relatively soft sandstone rock and would appreciate further opinions. --Scotch Mist 08:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 09:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Church forum Pompeii.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Portico to the "Eumachia", campanile of the basilica of the modern Pompei in background. Pompeii, Imperium romanum.--Jebulon 16:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Tilted ccw --Cccefalon 23:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Hasenläufer 23:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC
Hasenläufer,please have a look at the verticals of the window openings. I am not a fan of support votes who just annihilate obvious flaws of an image which is otherwise of good quality. I will add annotations to illustrate the issue. --Cccefalon 14:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks @Hasenläufer: , but I think @Cccefalon: is "right", and not the picture ! It is not a very important flaw, but easily correctible. I'll correct asap.--Jebulon 21:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
@Cccefalon and Jebulon: Thanks for your remarks! My assumption was, the minor vertical error was a fault of the ancient builder, not of the photographer, because other vertical lines look good.. --Hasenläufer 13:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
That is not impossible ! But I'll correct anyway.--Jebulon 16:52, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thank you, Jebulon. As I know, that you took the task now to your work list, I removed my oppose. I am abroad at the moment and can't guarant, that I can follow up in time. --Cccefalon 13:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Palauenc05 11:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Alcázar,_Jerez_de_la_Frontera,_España,_2015-12-07,_DD_59.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain --Poco a poco 20:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Blurred. --Medium69 22:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment Not at all. Please, let's discuss. --Poco a poco 18:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 23:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support OK to me --A.Savin 00:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blurred, especially at lower left corner. May be, the exposure time was too long. Was it taken at free hand? --Hasenläufer 00:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
    Sure it was. But that cannot be the point as 95% of the image is sharp IMHO Poco a poco 18:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support It might be blurred, but it's good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 08:48, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 09:06, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Brno View 45.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Church of St Thomas Portal (Brno) --Scotch Mist 10:39, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, blurred and perspective problems --Jacek Halicki 19:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agree with Jacek, + crop too tight.--Jebulon 16:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Have addressed 'perspective issue', re-cropped and 'sharpened' image which is now uploaded. Also, would propose changing title to "Church of St Thomas Doors beneath Portal Decoration (Brno)" as more appropriate to what is featured in the image. --SM1 (talk) 08:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 09:07, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Орловская_башня.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Orlovskaya Tower, Tobolsk Kremlin. --Óðinn 16:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Noisy. --Medium69 21:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
    •   Done - denoised --Óðinn 19:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sky area is overprocessed, sorry --A.Savin 14:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support noise ok now Dr. Chriss (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support not superior, but good quality --Hasenläufer 23:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blurred sky, sorry --Michielverbeek 08:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 09:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)