Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 05 2024

Consensual review edit

File:BMW_i5_M60_1X7A1643.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination BMW i5 M60 in Böblingen --Alexander-93 10:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. With all our understanding of kindness, we should not be too generous. The hood and windshield of the car are too bright, the reflection of the street lamp in the front window and the blue information sheet in the side window are very annoying and we don't even want to talk about the background. Please discuss whether the photo is really a quality image. -- Spurzem 14:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agree with Spurzem. Use of a polarizer should take out most of the extra reflections. --GRDN711 02:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Hospital_General_de_La_Rioja_in_Logrono_(1).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Hospital General de La Rioja in Logrono, La Rioja, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:38, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
      Oppose I disagree. It is way too dark, it has a slight blue tint, and the building is leaned outward (though only by a few pixels). Should be easy to fix though. (Seems that my original comment was lost due add-in malfunction or editing conflict.) --Plozessor 08:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Light is dull, but I think it's quite acceptable for a cloudy day. I don't see the perspective issue. Lines seem to be vertical to me. --Sebring12Hrs 12:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. I wouldn't try to take a quality image of a building under these weather conditions and at this time in January. Or should something special be represented? Furthermore, the perspective is not convincingly corrected; it seems unnatural. -- Spurzem 15:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Good attempt but agree with comments on being a little under-exposed and dull. A better day would make the difference. --GRDN711 02:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)