Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 07 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Open_wing_basking_of_Ixias_marianne_Cramer,_1779_–_White_Orange-tip_WLB_DSC_6297.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Open wing basking of Ixias marianne Cramer, 1779 – White Orange-tip (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 02:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 08:30, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
      Comment Ups. Second view (with more resolution).
  •   Oppose Sorry. It's not sharp enough. Ermell is right. --XRay 12:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Eyes are not sharp. Sorry. --Ermell 08:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose missed focus. --MB-one 18:02, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 07:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Wagner,_Falk-Constantin-1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Falk-Constantin Wagner im Rahmen des WLP Projektes in der Bremischen Bürgerschaft von User:Foto-AG Melle --Olaf Kosinsky 09:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Is there any process of improvement? In spite of all advices these purple fringes continue to be part of WLP pictures with out-of-center background contrast. --PtrQs 13:35, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support To my eye the purple fringing is barely noticeable even at 100% (at which point you can see tiny flakes in the hair far more clearly than you can see fringing). I think we need to accept that modern cameras are so high in resolution that the images they produce are not best viewed pixel-for-pixel. Eyes are sharp, background is sufficiently blurred to keep attention on the subject. Looks good to me.--Bobulous 17:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
    •   Comment Please look at the 'out-of-center' part of this picture. The width of the purple band around his right arm (I've marked it for you in the picture) is more than just a pixel. (btw: why should we have modern cameras if they condemn us to not repairable errors?) -PtrQs 18:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Description is not sufficient. -- Smial 19:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, there is a little bit of chromatic aberration, but it's minor. The main subject is in focus, well placed and well lit. Description with interwikilink was added. In my opinion Good enough to be a QI --D-Kuru 10:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:42, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose (for now) fringes on the the hair and sleeve (visible even at 30 % resolution, but luckily fixable). --MB-one 18:07, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose CA should be fixed.--Ermell 20:02, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 07:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)