Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 17 2019

Consensual review

edit

File:Raton_laveur_DSCF9235.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Raccoon in parc animalier de Sainte-Croix. --Musicaline 11:05, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Great light but the subject is too blurry, sorry --Podzemnik 11:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support. The animal's face looks very good. However, if I look at it larger than life, the sharpness should be even better. Nevertheless, it is a quality picture for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 19:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. --Charlesjsharp 22:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 09:14, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Obvious motion blur.--Peulle 23:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 09:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Церковь_Рождества_Иоанна_Предтечи_на_Волге_2.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Church of the Nativity of John the Baptist on the Volga. By User:MedvedevphotoNiklitov 18:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support - Striking, and seems like good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 19:59, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Please discuss, the picture is completely unsharp, colour noise in the water and the half car at the left is disturbing --Llez 22:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Fine-grained noise in the water, yeah. Sharp enough, IMO, at 3x my 13-inch laptop screen. Parts (not the subject, though) are unacceptably unsharp only at full size, if you're pixel-peeping, IMO. Car didn't bother me, but I predict that if nothing else sinks this, that will, since judges here are usually really bothered by that. -- Ikan Kekek 02:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment -Car bothers the whole recording. --Fischer.H 18:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Car is disturbing, white balance is too yellowish, unsharp towards the right border, both sides are leaning in. However, it might be possible to fix that all someway, the image is worth it. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others.--Peulle 23:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 09:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)