Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 20 2019

Consensual review

edit

File:Águila_calva_(Haliaeetus_leucocephalus),_trayecto_ferroviario_escénico_Seward-Anchorage,_Alaska,_Estados_Unidos,_2017-08-21,_DD_100.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Resurrection Bay, Seward, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 19:20, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose noise --Charlesjsharp 23:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Given the image size, the remaining noise is unobtrusive, and it is visible mosty in the background which is anyway (and correctly) out of focus. --Aristeas 09:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I see only one eagle, and it covers only about 2 % of the image. Kallerna 11:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Kallerna,--Fischer.H 15:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I don't care what percentage of the photo the eagle represents: it's a beautiful composition. I'm also OK with an unsharp background. However, the eagle is IMO of insufficient quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:44, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Basotxerri 17:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Sandy_Hill,_Ottawa_(20140920-IMG_9895).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Cultural heritage monument "The Albion Hotel", today part of the Novotel Ottawa --MB-one 11:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment with half a cyclist? --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
    •   Done cropped the cyclist. --MB-one 16:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support ok now --Charlesjsharp 23:26, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Good enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 17:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Ketchikan,_Alaska,_Estados_Unidos,_2017-08-16,_DD_06.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Ketchikan, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 19:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 20:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Not sharp enough IMO. --Tournasol7 00:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Sharp enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 17:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Jet_Airways_Flight_VT-JFR_at_Tribhuvan_International_Airport,_Nepal.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Jet Airways Flight VT-JFR at Tribhuvan International Airport, Nepal. Kind regards, --Tulsi Bhagat 10:45, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Bad composition --MB-one 11:25, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment That's right. But the composition does not matter in general. Or is it? Please discuss -- Spurzem 13:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment I've had an image opposed because the tip of an animal's tail was missing. --Charlesjsharp 16:59, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per MB-one --Sandro Halank 13:22, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Composition isn't too bad, IMO (I don't really care about the cutoff of part of a wing, only the remaining shape and its relation with other shapes), but there is too much noise in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek 09:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Basotxerri 17:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)