Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 23 2014

Consensual review

edit

File:Western massasauga rattlesnake.JPG

edit

 

  • Nomination: Western massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus tergeminus), photographed in northeast Oklahoma (by User:Goody0033). ArionEstar 15:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Oppose Lacks DOF, still a good shot --Poco a poco 20:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
    •   Support I disagree, DOF is ok for such a close-up macro --Uoaei1 07:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per poco --The Photographer 13:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per poco--Lmbuga 20:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
  • weak   Support – not perfect but good enough IMHO --Kreuzschnabel 17:25, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Focus is not 100% perfect on the eye, but 98.842% is ok for QI. -- Smial 14:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Interesting to VI, but not QI.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support For me it is ok for QI -- Holleday 21:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)