Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 12 2019

Consensual review

edit

File:Ancient_Roman_Mosaic_in_Utica,_Tunisia_09.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Ancient Roman Mosaic in Utica, Tunisia --Kritzolina 08:18, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Wishing for a bit more DoF but good enough --MB-one 12:31, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose I disagree this time. The main thing is the fish which is blurry. I'd expect better sharpness when it comes to easy-to-take picture like this --Podzemnik 05:21, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Main motif out of focus, sorry. --Smial 11:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 13:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Floor_in_ancient_Utica_04.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Floor in ancient Utica --Kritzolina 09:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose Only sharp in the foreground. Decrease the aperture. --Bernard Ladenthin 10:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
      Support - Good quality. No part is very unsharp at all, and the somewhat decreasing sharpness is perfectly within the bounds of artistic expression. -- Ikan Kekek 14:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
      Support per Ikan. --Aristeas 13:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan. --Smial 14:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Das Motiv dürfte etwas weiter rechts im Bild liegen. Aber es wird ja nicht als exzellentes, sondern als Qualitätsbild vorgestellt. -- Spurzem 15:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 14:32, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 13:47, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Catedral_Metropolitana,_México_D.F.,_México,_2013-10-16,_DD_79.JPG

edit

 

  • Nomination Facade of Metropolitan Cathedral, Mexico City, México --Poco a poco 08:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Strange FOV, people are disorted --Bernard Ladenthin 10:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose - Agreed. And correct me if I'm wrong, but to my understanding, unless there's a note stating that the decline is contested, the status of the photo should be "Decline", not "Discuss". (In other words, Poco, if you want to contest the decline, simply say so.) -- Ikan Kekek 14:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
    Indeed, I see no major issues with this image, quality is good and I chose this angle of the facade from the base --Poco a poco 17:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose I think the perspective is too distorted (i.e. the picture should have been taken from further away). --Domob 08:10, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment The motif and the image composition seem to me to be intended symmetrically, but it is not quite perfect. If this can be corrected, I would give a "pro". --Smial 12:53, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 14:33, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 12:42, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_de_Santa_Catalina_de_Siena,_Puebla,_México,_2013-10-11,_DD_01.JPG

edit

 

  • Nomination Interior of church of St. Catherine of Siena, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 08:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose The ISO seems to high, its extremely noisy. --Bernard Ladenthin 10:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
    Agree that this is not my best shot but still over the bar IMHO, I made some improvements --Poco a poco 17:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
      Oppose - Sorry, too much color noise on the ceiling for me to consider this quite a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 20:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Still too much noise despite reworking, sorry. --Smial 12:57, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 12:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

File:2018-01-04 (134) Volkswagen alloy wheel with Fulda Montero 3 195-65 R 15 91 T tire at Bahnhof Kirchstetten, Austria.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Fulda Montero 3 195/65 R 15 91 T tire at Bahnhof Kirchstetten, Austria.--GT1976 13:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose File name and image description are poorly chosen. From a very specific Fulda tire I would like to see more of the profile. But essentially, I see a dirty light metal wheel. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 10:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 21:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose zu langer Dateiname mit Sonderzeichen, die Dateibeschreibung hat nichts im Dateinamen verloren. --Ralf Roletschek 14:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
    •   Comment Ich finde, die VW-Teilenummer der Felge gehörte zur Vollständigkeit noch in den Dateinamen hinein. Wohingegen der Ort der Aufnahme bei solch einem Motiv vollständig überflüssig ist, außer evtl. der Angabe, unter welch einem VW-Modell das Ding montiert war. --Smial 06:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose a) per Spurzem, b) bad perspective. It is easily possible to take such a photo without perspective issues. --Smial 06:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 12:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)